In Vitro Evaluation of Pulsed Thulium:YAG and High-Power Ho:YAG Lasers with Multiple Pulse Modulations
Alejandra Bravo-Balado, Antoni Sánchez-Puy, Paula Izquierdo, Pietro Diana, Alberto Piana, Damiano Stracci, Paola Arena, Sílvia Gràcia Garcia, Andrés Koey Kanashiro, Félix Millán, Francisco Sánchez-Martín, Cristina Esquinas, Oriol Angerri, Joan Palou, Esteban EmilianiObjective:
To compare stone ablation volume (AV) and ablation morphology between pulsed thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG) and high-power holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) lasers with different pulse modulation technologies using an
Materials and Methods:
BegoStone phantoms (15:6 powder-to-water ratio) were used. A motorized arm applied the laser on the phantoms at a constant speed (0.7 mm/s). Three laser settings were tested: 1.5 J × 5 Hz, 1 J × 20 Hz, and 0.3 J × 50 Hz. For p-Tm:YAG, short pulse (SP) and long pulse (LP) modes were evaluated; for Ho:YAG, SP, LP, Vapor Tunnel™ (VT™), and Virtual Basket™ (VB™) modes were tested. Five 21-mm fissures were created per setting. AV was calculated from fissure width (WOF) and depth (DOF) measured by optical microscopy.
Results:
A total of 555 measurements were analyzed. At 1.5 J × 5 Hz, p-Tm:YAG (SP) produced the deepest fissures (DOF = 1000 µm
Conclusions:
p-Tm:YAG and Ho:YAG lasers demonstrated distinct ablation morphologies depending on pulse modulation and laser settings. At intermediate and low-energy settings, p-Tm:YAG (LP) produced wider, shallower fissures, whereas several Ho:YAG modalities achieved greater AV through deeper fissures. Ho:YAG (VB™) showed the most similar ablation morphology to p-Tm:YAG (LP). Whether these differences translate into clinical performance remains to be determined.