DOI: 10.1093/neuped/wuag026.369 ISSN: 2977-4454

ID #868 p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px ‘Times New Roman’; color: #000000 White matter differences in children with NF1 on MEK inhibition versus untreated children with NF1

Cynthia Campen, Vishnu Nair, Lisa Bruckert

Abstract

Introduction

MEK inhibition (MEKi) has demonstrated efficacy in treating plexiform neurofibromas and low-grade glioma in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). However, its effects on white matter development remain poorly understood. Given the role of the RAS-MAPK pathway in myelination and the presence of known white matter abnormalities in NF1, understanding how MEKi impacts developmental white matter trajectories is critical. This study examined longitudinal changes in white matter microstructure in children with NF1 receiving MEKi therapy compared to untreated NF1 controls.

Methods

Fourteen children with NF1 receiving MEKi aged 1.3-12.8 years (mean = 5.8 years) and thirteen untreated controls aged 4.1-16.5 years (mean = 10.3 years) underwent diffusion MRI at 3T (25 directions, b = 1000 s/mm2). Automated white matter tract (WMT) segmentation was used to extract fractional anisotropy (FA) from eight major WMTs. Linear mixed-effects models examined group differences (MEKi/non-MEKi) in longitudinal FA change after controlling for age at first scan. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (uncorrected).

Results

Compared to untreated NF1 patients, children receiving MEKi demonstrated significantly greater increases in FA over time in two of eight tracts: the corticospinal tract and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus [p = 0.032 and p = 0.040, respectively). The remaining 6 tracts showed similar trends without reaching significance.

Conclusion

MEKi is associated with greater longitudinal increases in white matter microstructural organization in select tracts involved in motor and cognitive function in children with NF1. These findings suggest MEK inhibition may positively impact white matter organization, with potential implications for neurodevelopmental outcomes. Larger, prospective longitudinal studies with extended follow-up are needed to determine whether these microstructural changes are associated with functional outcomes in this population.

More from our Archive