DOI: 10.1093/neuped/wuag026.149 ISSN: 2977-4454

ID #435 Individualized multimodal immunotherapy and tumor microenvironment therapy as part of a multiphase combined therapeutic strategy for adults with glioblastoma: a ten-year experience

Stefaan Van Gool, Jennifer Kosmal, Peter Van de Vliet, Linde Kampers

Abstract

Improving overall survival for patients with Glioblastoma remains challenging. Treating a highly dynamic spatio-temporal heterogeneous infiltrating tumor process with fixed protocols using 1-2 alkylating agents for 6-12 months is not the solution. We developed a multiphase combined treatment strategy for glioblastoma patients, including individualized multimodal immunotherapy and tumor microenvironment therapy in each phase (PMID40075726; PMID38548421). For the current real world data analysis, 104 patients were selected out of the database with criteria: treatment after 27/05/2015, adults aged 18 to 70y, documented IDH1wt status, OS status known, absence of second malignancy and known MGMT-promoter methylation status (meth versus unmeth). Sex distribution was 18 female / 25 male in meth patients versus 23 /38 in unmeth patients. Median age at intake was 54y (26-70) versus 50y (18-68). Extent of resection was 12 R0, 28 < R0 and 3 not available versus 25, 28 and 8. Median KPI at intake was 70 (50-100) versus 70 (50-100), and was the only risk factor that significantly decreased over the observation period. Patients received in median 37 (0-138) versus 31 (4-147) sessions of modulated-electrohyperthermia, 37 (5-138) versus 32 (5-147) injections of Newcastle Disease Virus and 2 (0-4) versus 1 (0-6) DC vaccines. Median OS and percentage 2y OS were 30 months and 69.8% (95%CI: +11.9, -17.0) in meth patients versus 20 months and 37.4% (+13.2, -13.3) in unmeth patients. There were no major adverse reactions (AR), but the burden of AR was increasing when using checkpoint inhibitors. Data on quality of life in a subgroup of patients is reported separately. The beneficial effect of this treatment strategy on OS and quality of life in a larger group of real world patients confirms earlier data. It remains unclear how to draw evidence out of individualized medicine, although felt necessarily for patients with Glioblastoma.

More from our Archive