Hybrid Quantum-Classical Neural Networks for Healthcare Prediction Powered by Automated Scientific Discovery
Karthik Meduri, Ruthvik Yedla, Santosh Reddy Addula, Guna Sekhar Sajja, Shaila Rana, Elyson De La Cruz, Mohan Harish Maturi, Hari GonayguntaThis study presents a reproducible evaluation framework for hybrid quantum-classical neural networks (HQCNNs) in healthcare classification, rather than a new architecture. We assess a four-qubit HQCNN combining a compact classical encoder, a two-layer parameterized quantum circuit (PQC), and a classical readout (441 trainable parameters) against carefully tuned classical baselines on the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset under identical five-fold cross-validation. The work is framed as a single-dataset proof-of-concept: the contribution is a documented, shared-fold evaluation protocol with a parameter-matched classical control and a quantified epistemic-informativeness analysis, not a demonstration of general quantum advantage. The HQCNN reached 96.49±1.96% accuracy and 99.44±0.60% ROC-AUC. A parameter-matched classical multilayer perceptron (441 parameters) reached 95.08±1.81% accuracy; the HQCNN’s +1.41 percentage-point edge at equal capacity was not statistically significant (paired t, p=0.056). Across five shared folds, no HQCNN-versus-classical accuracy difference survived Holm–Bonferroni correction (all adjusted p≥0.625), so we report the HQCNN as competitive with, not superior to, strong tuned classical baselines. A multi-split depth ablation showed that circuit depth L∈{1,2,3} had no statistically detectable effect on accuracy (L=2 vs. L=3: Wilcoxon p=1.00); we therefore adopt two variational layers as a practical default rather than an optimum. Under a low-noise simulator (depolarising and amplitude-damping channels, p=0.01), accuracy was 96.49%, indicating robustness only at modest uniform error rates; realistic hardware noise is higher. We additionally apply Bayesian surprise as an epistemic-informativeness heuristic—not a formal generative model—to rank which findings are most worth building on. The framework offers a reproducible, documented evaluation procedure that can support cumulative comparison of hybrid quantum-classical models in healthcare.