High Rate of Transplantation Before Review of Status Exception Requests Among Adult Heart Transplant Candidates
Daniel J. Ahn, Toshihiro Nakayama, Antony Attia, Molly White, Dalin Eap, Nikhil Narang, Kiran K. Khush, William F. Parker, Kazunari SasakiBACKGROUND:
In the US heart allocation system, when transplant centers submit applications for status exceptions to increase waitlist priority, patients obtain the requested status upgrades immediately while their applications are sent to the regional review boards (RRBs) and reviewed retrospectively. How often transplants occur during this period is unknown.
METHODS:
Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified all adult heart transplant candidates listed between October 18, 2018, and May 31, 2025, with submitted applications for status exceptions. We assessed (1) the time elapsed between submission of exception applications and their receipt by the RRBs and (2) the rate of heart transplantation during this travel time, stratified by whether the applications were eventually approved or denied. Additionally, we estimated how many listed patients were skipped by candidates who received transplants with exceptions that were ultimately denied.
RESULTS:
138 transplant centers submitted status exception requests on behalf of 11 508 adult candidates during the study period, of whom 913 (7.9%) received a denial at least once. The median time from obtaining status upgrades to application receipt by the RRBs was 3 days. Three thousand seven out of 11 508 (26.1%) patients received transplants before the RRBs even received their applications, with 174 (19.1%) among 913 with eventual denials and 2833 (26.7%) among 10 595 with approvals. The cumulative incidence of heart transplantation before application receipt for eventual denials was 19.1% (95% CI, 16.6%–21.7%), and that for approvals was 27.2% (95% CI, 26.4%–28.0%;
CONCLUSIONS:
More than 25% of patients with status exception requests receive heart transplants before their applications are even received by their RRBs, raising significant concerns about the fairness of retrospective review of exception requests for the allocation of donor hearts.