High Angle Working Group Analyses in Support of the Third Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop: Flutter Predictions
Pawel Chwalowski, Bret K. Stanford, Kevin E. Jacobson, Lior Poplingher, Daniella E. Raveh, Adam Jirasek, Jurgen Seidel, Giampaolo Pagliuca, Jose N. Berberoff-Naval, Matt Forster, Marcello Righi, Gabriele Immordino, Andrea Da Ronch, Steven E. Lamberson, Daniel Prosser, Ettore Fadiga, Stefano Oliani, Francesco Rondina, Luigi CaponeThis paper presents a summary of the computational flutter results associated with the AIAA Third Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop, High Angle Working Group. The computational results are compared against the experimental data collected during the Pitch and Plunge Apparatus Benchmark Supercritical Wing test campaign conducted in the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel at NASA Langley Research Center in 1993. During that test, several flutter points were identified at transonic conditions. One of these points, specifically near Mach 0.8 and a 5 deg angle of attack, became a focal point of the computational challenge within the working group. Various-fidelity time-domain, reduced-order model, and linearized frequency-domain methods were used by seven participating teams, and a description of each team’s software and methods is included. While there are encouraging trends in the computational results, the range of the predicted flutter dynamic pressure is still quite large due to the stall flutter mechanism. Comparisons are also complicated by the potential existence of a strong limit-cycle oscillation: the strength of the aeroelastic damping may depend strongly upon the size and character of the applied perturbation, but this perturbation had not been specified as a fixed parameter for workshop participants.