Hierarchical Phase Transitions in Bayesian Flow Networks Enable Training-Free Molecular Design
Liangji Zhou, Yuanqiu Chen, Tongtong Chen, Yijuan Huang, Qihao Pan, Si Li, Chenyu Gou, Meiqiong Fan, Yu GaoAbstract
Bayesian flow networks (BFNs) jointly model atomic coordinates and atom types for structure-based drug design, but their generative dynamics remain poorly understood. We show that the two channels resolve on different terms: atom types pass through a sharp commitment transition at tc1, whereas coordinate precision improves smoothly with no critical point of its own, reaching sub-Ångstrom resolution only at a stated threshold tc2. Extreme-value theory predicts the type channel’s posterior half-maximum in closed form, and the predicted 1/β1 scaling holds across seven β1 values (R2 = 0.996) and over 13 points spanning three BFN architectures and two domains, though measured times run 11%–20% below the predicted absolute values. Exploiting that structure, phase-aware iterative refinement aligns three rounds to these boundaries and trains no auxiliary regressor, reward function, or property predictor. On 100 CrossDocked2020 test pockets at K = 200, it reaches a mean Vina Dock of −8.72 kcal/mol. Gradient-guided methods that need such training stay ahead by a small margin: over the 100-pocket intersection, the paired gap to MolJO (−8.98) is 0.25 kcal/mol (95% CI [−0.13, +0.60], paired Wilcoxon p = 0.022); equivalence testing at a preregistered ±0.5 kcal/mol margin does not establish equivalence within it. CByG (−9.16) leads by 0.44 kcal/mol on unpaired means. Phase-aware iteration improves the Round-1 to Round-3 mean by 1.34 kcal/mol (paired Wilcoxon p = 4.80 × 10–18, Cohen’s dz = −1.59) and shifts the median by −1.44 kcal/mol, a shift Best-of-K resampling cannot produce. Paired on the pocket, an audited rerun passes every PoseBusters check 4.7 percentage points more often than MolJO.