Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Infusion Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Transplant Complications and Paediatric Disease Working Parties EBMT Joint Study
Guillermo Orti, Christophe Peczynski, Christian Koenecke, William Boreland, Maeve O'Reilly, Martin Bornhäuser, Adriana Balduzzi, Caroline Besley, Krzysztof Kalwak, Samppa Ryhanen, Tayfun Güngör, Robert F. Wynn, Peter Bader, Stephan Mielke, Didier Blaise, Persis Amrolia, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Friso G. J. Calkoen, Maria-Luisa Schubert, Victoria Potter, Wolfgang Holter, Nicolaus Kröger, Mi Kwon, Henrik Sengeloev, Helene Schoemans, Ivan Sergeevich Moiseev, Olaf Penack, Zinaida Peric- Cell Biology
- Hematology
- Immunology
- Biochemistry
Background
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART) have been incorporated into the therapeutic landscape of B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and B-non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL). The manufacturing process of commercially available autologous CART in patients relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) might include T-cells of donor origin. In this setting, there is limited data on graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) as an off-target effect in patients treated with CART after allo-HCT. We hereby report on a large, retrospective, EBMT registry-based study on GvHD in patients treated with CART therapy after allo-HCT.
Methods
Inclusion criteria were B-ALL and B-NHL adult and pediatric allo-HCT patients, treated with a first anti-CD19 CART (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel] and tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel]) from 2018 to August 2022. The primary study endpoints were the cumulative incidences (CI) of new acute GvHD (aGvHD) and chronic GvHD (cGvHD). Secondary endpoints were the 1-year GvHD relapse-free survival (GRFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS). Overall data was analyzed in a descriptive manner.
Results
A total of 257 allo-HCT patients treated with anti-CD19 CART were included. One hundred seventy-two patients (66.9%) were ≥18 years old. Tisa-cel was the therapy of choice in 184 patients (71.6%), whereas axi-cel was used in 73 patients (28.4%). More than half of the cohort (57.6%) underwent allo-HCT from unrelated donors. Notably, 109 patients (46.6%) and 38 patients (15%) had previously develop aGvHD and cGvHD between allo-HCT and CART infusion. Table 1 describes data on baseline patient, allo-HCT and CART characteristics of the whole cohort and of patients developing aGvHD and cGvHD.
In total, 3 patients developed new aGvHD and 6 patients developed new cGvHD after CART therapy. The 100-day CI of new aGvHD was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4-4.2) and the 12-month CI of new cGvHD was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.1-5.7). No GvHD was observed in the pediatric cohort. The median time from allo-HCT to CART infusion was 15.8 months (range, 3.8-220.3) and the median times from CART to the development of aGvHD and cGvHD were respectively 44 days (range, 8-81) and 144 days (range, 5-182).
The 1-year GRFS and NRM were 52.1% (95% CI 45.6-59.4) and 4.7% (95% CI 2.5-8.1) respectively (Figure 1). With a median follow up of 18.8 months (95% CI, 16.2-23.7), the 1-year OS was 76.8% (95% CI 71.5-82.4). The most frequent cause of death was disease-related in 56 patients (74.6%).
Conclusion
Together, in this large cohort including adult and pediatric allo-HCT patients treated with tisa-cel and axi-cel after allo-HCT, these data show that the incidence of both aGvHD and cGvHD is very low. Of note, GvHD was not observed in the pediatric cohort. Furthermore, no excessive NRM was observed compared to previously published methods of treating relapse post allo-HCT, being disease progression a major hurdle to optimal outcomes in this cohort of patients.