DOI: 10.3390/medsci14060601 ISSN: 2076-3271

Genetic Aspects of Reproductive Function Disorders in Men with Impaired Semen Parameters

Nina Kulchenko, Galina Myandina, Hasan Alhejoj, Alexandr Strachuk, Vladislav Bolshakov, Tatiana Demura, Nina Paramonova, Oksana Kichigina, Anna Romanovskya, Marina Krot, Artemii Mingazov, Yulii Shidlovskii, Grigory Demyashkin

Background: Male infertility is a pressing clinical and social issue, affecting approximately 30–50% of infertile couples. Despite extensive research, the etiology remains unknown in a considerable proportion of cases, underscoring the need for molecular genetic investigations into spermatogenesis disorders. Methods: the study enrolled 187 European men (68 fertile, 119 infertile). Infertile patients were stratified into four subgroups: azoospermia (n = 28), asthenozoospermia (n = 32), teratozoospermia (n = 25), and oligozoospermia (n = 34). Genotyping was performed for polymorphisms in folate metabolism (MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1298C, MTR A2756G, MTRR A66G), redox system (CAT-262C > T, GSTP1 Ile105Val, GSTP1 Ala114Val), phosphodiesterase (PDE7B G/A), and selenoprotein (SEPS1 G-105A) genes. Statistical analyses included χ2 tests, logistic regression, genetic risk score (GRS) calculation, and ROC analysis, with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons (FDR, q < 0.05 considered significant). Groups were comparable in age, BMI, and hormonal profiles. Results: in oligozoospermia, nominal associations were detected with MTR A2756G (OR = 2.70; p = 0.003), CAT-262T (OR = 3.12; p = 0.0005), and SEPS1 G-105A (OR = 3.45; p = 0.0001); after FDR correction, only CAT and SEPS1 remained significant. Multivariate regression, adjusting for age, BMI, and hormones, confirmed independent associations for CAT (aOR = 2.34; p = 0.002; q = 0.04) and SEPS1 (aOR = 2.89; p = 0.0001; q = 0.002). MTR A2756G showed nominal associations with astheno-, terato-, and oligozoospermia, but none survived FDR correction. CAT-262T was associated with oligozoospermia (q = 0.04) and borderline with asthenozoospermia (q = 0.08); SEPS1 was significantly associated with both asthenozoospermia (q = 0.04) and oligozoospermia (q = 0.004). GRS was highest in oligozoospermia (3.4 ± 1.5) and significantly elevated in asthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia (3.1 ± 1.2 and 3.2 ± 1.4, respectively), but not in azoospermia (2.3 ± 1.1; p = 0.087). GRS ≥ 3 was found in 64.7% of infertile men vs. 26.5% of fertile controls, corresponding to a 5-fold increased risk (χ2 = 22.4; p < 0.001). The combined GRS achieved an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.67–0.81), with 68.2% sensitivity and 76.5% specificity at a cut-off of ≥3. No associations with azoospermia reached significance for any polymorphism; this subgroup had limited power (n = 28). Conclusions: in this exploratory study, CAT and SEPS1 polymorphisms demonstrated FDR-significant associations with oligozoospermia and asthenozoospermia in European men. The cumulative genetic score (AUC = 0.74) may serve as a useful tool for risk stratification, but these findings require replication in larger independent cohorts before clinical translation.