DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines14071451 ISSN: 2227-9059

Gene Therapy for β-Haemoglobinopathies: From Molecular Correction to Curative Medicine

Federica Fogliazza, Giulia Carbone, Martina Berzieri, Davide Ciriaco, Susanna Esposito

Background: β-haemoglobinopathies, including sickle cell disease and transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia, are among the most common monogenic disorders worldwide and represent a major global health burden. Conventional treatments, such as blood transfusions, iron chelation, fetal haemoglobin induction, and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, have improved outcomes but remain limited by treatment-related toxicity, donor availability, and incomplete curative potential. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed up to 2025. Search terms included “sickle cell disease,” “sickle cell anemia,” “β-thalassemia,” “transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia,” “gene therapy,” “gene addition,” “gene editing,” “CRISPR-Cas9,” “lentiviral vector,” “children,” “paediatric,” and “pediatric.” Relevant clinical trials, reviews, consensus statements, and guidelines were selected and qualitatively analysed. Results: Gene therapy for β-haemoglobinopathies is based mainly on two strategies: gene addition and gene editing. Gene addition uses lentiviral vectors to introduce functional or modified β-globin genes into autologous haematopoietic stem cells, whereas gene editing targets regulatory pathways, particularly BCL11A, to reactivate fetal haemoglobin synthesis or correct disease-causing mutations. Clinical studies have shown encouraging outcomes, including transfusion independence in many patients with β-thalassaemia and marked reduction or elimination of vaso-occlusive crises in sickle cell disease. Paediatric and adolescent data are increasingly promising, although still limited. Conclusions: Gene therapy is reshaping the treatment landscape of β-haemoglobinopathies by offering a personalised and potentially curative approach. However, long-term safety, conditioning toxicity, fertility preservation, accessibility, costs, and implementation in high-prevalence regions remain critical challenges. Further studies are needed to optimise patient selection and expand equitable access.

More from our Archive