GECKO-A v1.0: exploring VOC oxidation trajectories through comparison with the master chemical mechanism
Bernard Aumont, Richard Valorso, Andrew Rickard, Mike Jenkin, Julia Lee-Taylor, John Orlando, Sasha Madronich, Luc Vereecken, Marie CamredonNumerical models are crucial tools for understanding complex chemical systems such as the atmosphere, and their sensitivity across a range of conditions. In atmospheric chemistry models, reaction mechanisms are used to represent chemical transformations and define the underlying system of equations. Building highly explicit mechanisms that capture the full complexity of organic oxidation occurring in the atmosphere remains challenging owing to the large number of intermediates involved, the breadth of reaction pathways, and the limited availability of reliable kinetic and thermodynamic data. The Generator for Explicit Chemistry and Kinetics of Organics in the Atmosphere (GECKO-A) was developed to address these limitations by enabling the systematic construction of near-explicit mechanisms. Here, we present its first open-source release (v1.0), which incorporates updated chemical protocols and structure-activity relationships, together with its companion box model for mechanism integration. GECKO-A's performance is benchmarked through systematic comparisons with the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM v3.3.1), based on simulations of the oxidation of five representative hydrocarbons (butane, octane, dodecane, toluene, and α -pinene) under environmental conditions ranging from urban to remote. The two approaches yield similar oxidation pathways for small and structurally simple compounds. However, differences increase with the size and complexity of the carbon backbone. In particular, the simplifications inherent to the MCM tend to limit the formation of multifunctional products and promote earlier fragmentation, resulting in notable discrepancies in the predicted volatility of secondary organic carbon and, consequently, in secondary organic aerosol yields. These discrepancies stem from how each mechanism treats multigenerational oxidation. The two approaches remain similar for early-generation products, but diverge as later generations become predominant. This divergence also extends to the water solubility of secondary organic carbon, and to its partitioning into aqueous condensed phases. GECKO-A also enables mechanism generation at different levels of chemical resolution. A reduced mechanism, denoted red-GECKO-A, is compared to the high-resolution mechanism used throughout this study. It closely reproduces the simulated oxidative trajectories for most parent compounds and scenarios. Discrepancies emerge for octane and dodecane under NO x -poor conditions.