DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines14112507 ISSN: 2227-9059

From KDIGO Staging Toward Dynamic AKI Phenotyping: A Function–Biology–Reserve–Duration Framework Across the AKI–AKD Continuum

Federico Nalesso, Silvia De Rosa, Lucia Federica Stefanelli, Martina Cacciapuoti, Leda Cattarin, Ruggero Zanella, Maria Mazzitelli, Sergio Lassola, Dorella Del Prete, Gianni Carraro, Giovanni Maria Ellerani, Francesca Katiana Martino, Pietro Manuel Ferraro, Marco Fiorentino, Dinna Cruz, Pasquale Esposito

The 2012 KDIGO staging system standardized acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis; however, its reliance on serum creatinine and urine output primarily captures established functional impairment and incompletely reflects early biological injury, patient susceptibility, and temporal trajectories. The March 2026 KDIGO Public-Review Draft substantially expands this paradigm by incorporating biomarkers, susceptibility and kidney functional reserve, and temporal phenotyping, although these dimensions remain only partially integrated into a unified longitudinal phenotype architecture. This narrative review introduces a pragmatic, bedside-oriented extension of this emerging framework, integrating function, biology, susceptibility, and trajectory to support anticipatory risk stratification across the AKI–acute kidney disease (AKD) continuum. We developed a modular taxonomy based on an analytical review of stress and damage biomarkers, renal functional reserve (RFR) assessment, including emerging ultrasound-based renal stress testing, and temporal disease mapping. These elements were integrated into a multidimensional phenotyping framework (F–B–R–D) and a structured clinical pathway. Function (F) remains anchored to KDIGO serum creatinine and urine output criteria; Biology (B) captures kidney stress or structural damage using context-appropriate biomarkers; Reserve (R) describes preserved or reduced RFR as a proposed operational descriptor of reserve-related vulnerability; and Duration (D) captures persistence, recovery, and progression toward AKD. AKI risk is conceptualized as a qualitative interaction between susceptibility and exposure load (E), allowing candidate multidimensional phenotypes to be mapped to proposed action bundles for prevention, diagnostic escalation, and structured follow-up. The F–B–R–D taxonomy is intended to complement, rather than replace, KDIGO classification. If prospectively validated, it could support more proactive monitoring, individualized prevention, and longitudinal risk assessment.

More from our Archive