From Geometric Complexity to Informational Dimensionality in Scaffold-Guided Tissue Regeneration

Scaffold architecture shapes tissue regeneration through the mechanical, topographical, and biochemical cues it presents to cells, yet geometrically elaborate scaffolds do not reliably produce more organized tissues, while comparatively simple architectures can exert strong organizational effects. We argue that scaffold performance is better understood by distinguishing geometric complexity from effective informational dimensionality: a relational property of the scaffold–cell system, defined as the number of independently manipulated architectural directions that produce distinguishable, above-noise changes in a jointly measured mechanotransductive response. Unlike structural entropy, fractal dimension, or feature-counting metrics, this construct depends on cellular accessibility, cue persistence, and non-redundancy. Mechanotransduction supplies its biological basis, integrating scaffold-derived cues through focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, nuclear deformation, and YAP/TAZ signaling, and we distinguish early resolvability from later organizational stabilization. We outline an operational strategy for estimating both from factorial scaffold libraries, common readout panels, and rank-based analysis of the response mapping, illustrated with selected experimental precedents rather than a systematic evidence sample. Positioned relative to biomimetic, mechanobiology-guided, and morphospace approaches, it yields testable predictions on dimensional compression, redundancy, and the resolvability–stability dissociation. Scaffold design is thus reframed from maximizing complexity or native resemblance toward engineering stable, cell-readable dimensions of organization.