DOI: 10.3390/app16136501 ISSN: 2076-3417

Four-Week High-Intensity Interval Training Improves 2000-m Rowing Performance and Tensiomyographic Mechanical Properties in Rowers

Chao-Yuan Chen, Mon-Chien Lee, Chia-An Ho, Ying-Ti Shih, Chi-Chang Huang

While high-intensity interval training (HIIT) enhances physical conditioning, its specific impact on the TMG-derived mechanical properties of rowing-related muscles and sport-specific performance remains underexplored. This study investigated the effects of a 4-week rowing ergometer-based HIIT intervention on 2000-m rowing performance and muscle mechanical properties, evaluated via tensiomyography (TMG). Seventeen rowers were randomized into the HIIT group (n = 9) or the control group (CON, n = 8). Over four weeks, the HIIT group completed two weekly rowing ergometer HIIT sessions (ten 60-s all-out sprints, 30-s recovery), while the CON group continued regular training without additional HIIT. Pre- and post-intervention, participants underwent a 2000-m ergometer trial and TMG assessments across five rowing-related muscles. The HIIT group demonstrated a 3.1% reduction in 2000-m completion time, together with increases in mean power output (7.7%) and stroke rate (6.5%) (group × time interaction η2p = 0.53, 0.39, and 0.27, respectively; p < 0.05). TMG analysis showed shortened delay time (Td) and half-relaxation time (Tr) across all targeted muscles after false discovery rate correction. Contraction time (Tc) was shortened in the tibialis anterior and vastus medialis, while the erector spinae showed a nominal uncorrected change that should be interpreted cautiously. Maximal displacement (Dm) and sustain time (Ts) remained unchanged. These findings suggest that short-term rowing-specific HIIT is associated with improved 2000-m performance and TMG-derived peripheral temporal properties; however, unchanged Dm should be interpreted only as no detectable change in radial displacement under the present TMG conditions rather than definitive evidence of unchanged muscle stiffness. Because of the small sample size, unbalanced total training load between groups, and the absence of direct physiological or biomechanical measurements such as VO2max, lactate, electromyography, and stroke biomechanics, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary.

More from our Archive