DOI: 10.1017/jsl.2026.10271 ISSN: 0022-4812

FIRST-ORDER DISTINGUISHABILITY OF SPARSE RANDOM GRAPHS

TAL HERSHKO, MAKSIM ZHUKOVSKII

Abstract

We study the problem of distinguishing between two independent samples

G n 1 , G n 2 $\mathbf {G}_n^1,\mathbf {G}_n^2$ bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 1 Baseline comma bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 2
of a binomial random graph
G ( n , p ) $G(n,p)$ upper G left parenthesis n comma p right parenthesis
by first-order (FO) sentences. Shelah and Spencer proved that, for a constant
α ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) $\alpha \in (0,1)$ alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis
,
G ( n , n − α ) $G(n,n^{-\alpha })$ upper G left parenthesis n comma n Superscript negative alpha Baseline right parenthesis
obeys FO zero-one law if and only if
α $\alpha $ alpha
is irrational. Therefore, for irrational
α ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) $\alpha \in (0,1)$ alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis
, any fixed FO sentence does not distinguish between
G n 1 , G n 2 $\mathbf {G}_n^1,\mathbf {G}_n^2$ bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 1 Baseline comma bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 2
with asymptotical probability 1 (w.h.p.) as
n → ∞ $n\to \infty $ n right arrow infinity
. We show that the minimum quantifier depth
k α $\mathbf {k}_{\alpha }$ bold k Subscript alpha
of an FO sentence
φ = φ ( G n 1 , G n 2 ) $\varphi =\varphi (\mathbf {G}_n^1,\mathbf {G}_n^2)$ phi equals phi left parenthesis bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 1 Baseline comma bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 2 Baseline right parenthesis
distinguishing between
G n 1 , G n 2 $\mathbf {G}_n^1,\mathbf {G}_n^2$ bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 1 Baseline comma bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 2
depends on how closely
α $\alpha $ alpha
can be approximated by rationals:
•

for all non-Liouville

α ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) $\alpha \in (0,1)$ alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis
,
k α = Ω ( ln ⁡ ln ⁡ ln ⁡ n ) $\mathbf {k}_{\alpha }=\Omega (\ln \ln \ln n)$ bold k Subscript alpha Baseline equals normal upper Omega left parenthesis ln ln ln n right parenthesis
w.h.p.;

•

there are irrational

α ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) $\alpha \in (0,1)$ alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis
with
k α $\mathbf {k}_{\alpha }$ bold k Subscript alpha
that grow arbitrarily slowly w.h.p.;

•

k α = O p ( ln ⁡ n ln ⁡ ln ⁡ n ) $\mathbf {k}_{\alpha }=O_p(\frac {\ln n}{\ln \ln n})$ bold k Subscript alpha Baseline equals upper O Subscript p Baseline left parenthesis StartFraction ln n Over ln ln n EndFraction right parenthesis
for all
α ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) $\alpha \in (0,1)$ alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis
.

The main ingredients in our proofs are a novel randomized algorithm that generates asymmetric strictly balanced graphs as well as a new method to study symmetry groups of randomly perturbed graphs.

More from our Archive