Abstract
We study the problem of distinguishing between two independent samples
G
n
1
,
G
n
2
$\mathbf {G}_n^1,\mathbf {G}_n^2$
bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 1 Baseline comma bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 2
of a binomial random graph
G
(
n
,
p
)
$G(n,p)$
upper G left parenthesis n comma p right parenthesis
by first-order (FO) sentences. Shelah and Spencer proved that, for a constant
α
∈
(
0
,
1
)
$\alpha \in (0,1)$
alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis
,
G
(
n
,
n
−
α
)
$G(n,n^{-\alpha })$
upper G left parenthesis n comma n Superscript negative alpha Baseline right parenthesis
obeys FO zero-one law if and only if
α
$\alpha $
alpha
is irrational. Therefore, for irrational
α
∈
(
0
,
1
)
$\alpha \in (0,1)$
alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis
, any fixed FO sentence does not distinguish between
G
n
1
,
G
n
2
$\mathbf {G}_n^1,\mathbf {G}_n^2$
bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 1 Baseline comma bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 2
with asymptotical probability 1 (w.h.p.) as
n
→
∞
$n\to \infty $
n right arrow infinity
. We show that the minimum quantifier depth
k
α
$\mathbf {k}_{\alpha }$
bold k Subscript alpha
of an FO sentence
φ
=
φ
(
G
n
1
,
G
n
2
)
$\varphi =\varphi (\mathbf {G}_n^1,\mathbf {G}_n^2)$
phi equals phi left parenthesis bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 1 Baseline comma bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 2 Baseline right parenthesis
distinguishing between
G
n
1
,
G
n
2
$\mathbf {G}_n^1,\mathbf {G}_n^2$
bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 1 Baseline comma bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 2
depends on how closely
α
$\alpha $
alpha
can be approximated by rationals:
•
for all non-Liouville
α
∈
(
0
,
1
)
$\alpha \in (0,1)$
alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis
,
k
α
=
Ω
(
ln
ln
ln
n
)
$\mathbf {k}_{\alpha }=\Omega (\ln \ln \ln n)$
bold k Subscript alpha Baseline equals normal upper Omega left parenthesis ln ln ln n right parenthesis
w.h.p.;
•
there are irrational
α
∈
(
0
,
1
)
$\alpha \in (0,1)$
alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis
with
k
α
$\mathbf {k}_{\alpha }$
bold k Subscript alpha
that grow arbitrarily slowly w.h.p.;
•
k
α
=
O
p
(
ln
n
ln
ln
n
)
$\mathbf {k}_{\alpha }=O_p(\frac {\ln n}{\ln \ln n})$
bold k Subscript alpha Baseline equals upper O Subscript p Baseline left parenthesis StartFraction ln n Over ln ln n EndFraction right parenthesis
for all
α
∈
(
0
,
1
)
$\alpha \in (0,1)$
alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis
.
The main ingredients in our proofs are a novel randomized algorithm that generates asymmetric strictly balanced graphs as well as a new method to study symmetry groups of randomly perturbed graphs.