Fault-Aware Decision Support for Renewable-Powered EV Charging Stations Using Multi-Source Explainable Learning

Electric vehicle charging stations (EVCSs) are increasingly deployed as grid-interactive energy assets that combine power electronic converters, sensing devices, communication interfaces, photovoltaic (PV) generation, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and multiple charging ports. This complexity creates reliability challenges because abnormal behavior may originate from electrical, thermal, sensing, communication, port-level, or grid-side sources. This paper proposes a fault-aware decision-support framework for renewable-powered EVCSs using multi-source explainable learning. The framework integrates electrical, thermal, session/port, grid/PV/BESS, and communication/data-quality indicators into a unified health-monitoring representation. Supervised models diagnose known fault classes, anomaly-detection models flag unknown or anomalous events, and a source-level explainability layer supports candidate-source interpretation and maintenance-oriented risk mapping. A scenario-controlled EVCS benchmark is developed with PV generation, BESS operation, grid import, charging-port behavior, communication/data-quality indicators, and six injected fault/anomaly categories. An extended 180-day benchmark further assesses longer-horizon operation, seasonal/weather diversity, drift/ageing proxies, and event-level behavior. The strongest closed-set classifier, LightGBM with class weights, achieved 98.45% accuracy and 0.9792 macro-F1, while the Random Forest model used for explainability and decision-layer analysis achieved 97.35% accuracy and 0.9626 macro-F1. Full multi-source monitoring improved Random Forest macro-F1 from 0.6922 under electrical-only monitoring to 0.9626, demonstrating within the controlled benchmark the diagnostic value of heterogeneous EVCS observability. Open-set performance was source dependent: sensor/measurement and communication/data anomalies were more detectable, whereas thermal/cooling and port/session unknowns remained difficult at the selected threshold. Under nominal scenario-based response assumptions, unavailable port hours and unmet charging energy decreased by 49.01% and 38.33%, respectively, relative to reactive operation; sensitivity analysis showed that these outcomes depend on intervention effectiveness and response delay. These findings establish controlled-benchmark feasibility for explainable multi-source EVCS decision support. Field validation using charger telemetry, maintenance-confirmed labels, and operator-calibrated response policies remains necessary.