DOI: 10.3390/ijerph23101273 ISSN: 1660-4601

Factors Associated with Employment, Household Income and Income Satisfaction Following Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa

Eugene Nizeyimana, Quinette Louw, Mokgadi Kholofelo Mashola, Conran Joseph

Paid employment, household income and income satisfaction are distinct post-SCI socioeconomic outcomes that may reflect not only injury severity but also broader social and system-level influences. This study examined factors associated with these three outcomes among adults living with SCI in South Africa. This cross-sectional secondary analysis used data collected during the South African implementation of the second International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) Community Survey, which constituted a new round of data collection. Community-dwelling adults aged 18 years or older and at least 12 months post-injury were recruited from four provinces using a pragmatic convenience-sampling approach; 461 participants were included. Hierarchical regression models assessed injury-related, sociodemographic and system/environmental factors, interpreted through a social-determinants-of-health lens. Injury-related factors explained little variance overall, whereas education was consistently associated with all three outcomes. In the final employment model, each additional system/environmental barrier was associated with lower odds of paid employment (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66–0.89). The barrier score was not associated with household income but was associated with lower odds of income satisfaction (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.95). These cross-sectional findings indicate that post-SCI employment and financial outcomes were associated with factors beyond lesion characteristics alone; they do not establish causal relationships. Sensitivity analysis using the original 1–10 income-satisfaction scale retained the strong education pattern, whereas the barrier-count association was attenuated and did not reach conventional statistical significance (p = 0.076). The cumulative system/environmental barrier count was exploratory and was not a validated psychometric scale. Because recruitment was service-linked and restricted to four purposively selected provinces, the findings should not be interpreted as nationally representative.