Exploring Socioeconomic Disparities in Mandibular Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Patient Profiles and Treatment Outcomes
Dylan Kahler, Rebecca Gardella, Sai Reddy, Huaqing Zhao, Mykal Gerald, Christine Jones- Otorhinolaryngology
- Oral Surgery
- Surgery
Study Design
Retrospective Chart Review.
Objective
Mandible fracture is a life-altering event, and its complications can have devastating consequences for patients. Patients are therefore well-served if providers can identify their risk factors and engage strategies to reduce complication risk. The present study examines mandible trauma in an urban tertiary hospital serving an economically disadvantaged population.
Methods
This review identified all patients undergoing operative repair of traumatic mandible fractures from January 2015 to December 2020. Patient risk factors, operative technique, and surgical complications (including infection, hardware failure, malunion, and mandible nonunion) were analyzed.
Results
Two hundred and seventy-two patients were identified with mandible fractures; 78.3% of these injuries were related to interpersonal violence; 83.4% of patients were male, and 55.5% were African American. Based on multivariable logistic regression models, increased rates of postoperative complications were observed in patients with increasing Area Deprivation Index (Odds Ratio 1.02), mandible body fracture (OR 3.11), tobacco use disorder (OR 3.75), history of hepatitis C infection (OR 7.35), and discharge to drug and alcohol rehabilitation (OR 23.42).
Conclusions
For providers treating patients with mandible fractures, the effects of comorbid substance use—including tobacco use—and inadequate discharge disposition (a reflection of financial means and insurance status) should be identified early, and steps to mitigate their consequences should be taken. Providers must recognize that patients with these comorbidities require more patience, support, and attention than patients without these risk factors. Increased engagement with multidisciplinary services such as psychiatry, addiction medicine, primary care, and social work may improve outcomes for these vulnerable patients.