Experimental Study on the Combined Effects of Swirl and Inlet Offset on the Flow through an Automotive Catalyst Monolith Substrate

<div>Maldistributed flow within an automotive catalyst can cause reduced conversion efficiency, high pressure loss, and premature deactivation. However, packaging constraints often result in uneven flow distribution between the monolith channels, thus compromising design and, inevitably, performance of the device. Flow uniformity may be improved by the introduction of swirl upstream of the catalyst assembly, and in turbocharged applications the residual swirl from the turbine can serve that purpose. Indeed, low swirl has been shown to provide favorable flow uniformity in the monolith substrate in an axisymmetric flow setup. However, the automotive exhaust aftertreatment setups are seldom axisymmetric, and the combined effects of inlet swirl and offset on the flow profile through a monolith substrate are unknown.</div> <div>To address this gap, this study provides the first systematic experimental characterization of the coupled influence of inlet swirl and packaging-relevant inlet offset on flow development and uniformity in a sudden expansion catalyst assembly. Particle image velocimetry (PIV), wall pressure measurements, and hot-wire anemometry (HWA) are combined to link the upstream separation and recirculation structures to the velocity distribution downstream of the monolith. The results reveal a previously unreported swirl-dependent sensitivity to geometric asymmetry: under no-swirl and moderate-swirl conditions, flow uniformity is robust to inlet offset, varying by no more than 1.4%, whereas at low swirl the offset reduces uniformity by up to 8% at high mass flow rate. Increasing mass flow rate reduces uniformity by up to 15%, while swirl improves uniformity by up to 19% relative to axial flow. These findings demonstrate that improvements observed for swirl in axisymmetric assemblies cannot be assumed to transfer directly to offset geometries. Swirl intensity and inlet alignment must instead be considered as coupled design variables. The measurements also provide a benchmark dataset for validating computational fluid dynamics simulations before their application to production-type systems.</div>