Evaluating the Stacked Economic Value of Load Shifting and Microgrid Control

Microgrids and load shifting can improve resilience and lower costs for electricity customers. The costs to deploy each have decreased and helped accelerate their deployment in the U.S. and globally. However, previous research has focused minimally on the combined benefit or “stacked economic value” that these assets could provide jointly. This article evaluates the financial value when those assets are combined and optimized jointly. The methods are demonstrated for a U.S. government facility with an existing microgrid and building automation system, with optimizations that vary the percentage load shifted and the duration of time the load can be shifted. The economic benefits of load shifting are greater when combined with a microgrid and coordinated dispatch of loads and microgrid assets. The methods and case study results illustrate “stacked economic value” showing energy charge reductions are 56–252% greater and demand charge reductions are 96–226% greater when load shifting is combined with a microgrid as compared to load shifting without a microgrid. Increasing the amount and duration of load shifting improves the stacked economic value as more loads are scheduled coincident with on-site generation to offset or completely avoid utility purchases during peak pricing periods, an underlying behavior that enables stacked economic value and increased financial savings. The percentage reduction in demand charges is greater than energy charges—a generalizable finding—but the relative impact on utility expenditures is dependent on the utility tariff structure and composition of demand charges and energy charges in the utility bill. In this case study, demand charge reductions were four times greater than energy charge reductions, but the financial savings of demand charges are less due to their smaller proportion of utility charges. This suggests that the stacked economic value of microgrids and load control may be even more significant in locations with electricity tariffs that more heavily weight billing towards demand charges than energy charges.