DOI: 10.3390/coatings16080944 ISSN: 2079-6412

Ergonomic Evaluation of Surface-Layer Materials and Contact Interfaces for Classroom Nap-Chair Comfort Using Pressure Mapping and Electrodermal Activity

Wangyu Xu, Yushu Chen, Ying Gao, Xuanlin Ge

Contact-surface construction affects pressure distribution, physiological response, and perceived comfort in body-contact furniture. This study compared five contact interfaces for classroom nap chairs: rigid polypropylene (PP), a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)-surfaced PP laminate, woven mesh, closed-cell ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) foam, and flexible polyurethane (PU) foam. Twenty-six participants, including 13 females and 13 males, were tested in a 95° study posture and a 135° nap posture at the head–neck, waist–back, and hip–thigh regions. Four participant-level pressure indicators were direction-corrected and combined using an equal-weight geometric mean. The pressure index was integrated with electrodermal activity (EDA) at the participant level and subsequently combined across postures with weak subjective calibration. Under the 95° posture, EVA foam ranked highest at the hip–thigh region, while PU foam ranked highest at the waist–back and head–neck regions. Under the 135° posture, woven mesh ranked highest at the hip–thigh and head–neck regions, while PU foam remained highest at the waist–back region. Final integrated suitability differed significantly among materials in all three body regions (Friedman χ2 (4) = 90.246–96.769, all p < 0.001). M4 had the highest mean in the head–neck region (0.648), but did not differ significantly from M5 (0.634; Holm-adjusted p = 0.075). M5 had the highest mean in the waist–back region (0.821), and M3 in the hip–thigh region (0.679); both were significantly higher than the corresponding second-ranked interfaces (Holm-adjusted p < 0.001). Exploratory stiffness models indicated peak locations near 130 kPa for the head–neck region and 140 kPa for the hip–thigh region, whereas the waist–back response was highest at the lower measured boundary of 70 kPa. These findings support region-specific interface design rather than a uniform contact surface for the entire chair.

More from our Archive