Environmental Behavior, Toxicological Pathways, and Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): From Molecular Structure to Human Health
Joanna Harasym, Edyta NizioPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) represent a major class of ubiquitous environmental pollutants, posing significant risks to ecosystems and human health due to their persistence, toxicity, and potential for bioaccumulation. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of current scientific knowledge on PAHs, integrating insights from chemical kinetics, environmental fate, and toxicological mechanisms. The fundamental structural chemistry of PAHs and its direct influence on their physicochemical properties and environmental properties are discussed. The major anthropogenic and natural sources of PAHs are detailed, alongside the chemical kinetics behind their formation during incomplete combustion and their transformation in environmental media. Unlike previous reviews that address PAH sources, remediation, or health effects as separate topics, this review uniquely traces the mechanistic continuum from molecular formation kinetics through physicochemical partitioning and environmental transport to toxicological endpoints, providing a causally linked framework for understanding how structural properties ultimately determine biological outcomes. A central focus is placed on the environmental fate and transport of PAHs across atmospheric, aquatic, and terrestrial compartments, highlighting processes such as gas–particle partitioning, sediment accumulation, and long-range transport. The review further elucidates the complex toxicological pathways of PAHs, including metabolic activation to reactive intermediates, DNA adduct formation, oxidative stress, and their roles in carcinogenesis and other systemic health effects. The analysis reveals strong scientific consensus on the carcinogenic mechanism of parent PAHs via CYP450-mediated metabolic activation to diol-epoxide intermediates while identifying critical areas of uncertainty: the current regulatory framework based on 16 priority PAHs underestimates total carcinogenic risk by a factor of 2–5, mixture toxicology remains poorly characterized, and dose–response relationships for non-cancer endpoints (cardiovascular, neurodevelopmental, immunotoxic) lack the quantitative data needed for robust risk assessment. Finally, human exposure pathways and health risk characterization approaches are discussed, highlighting the need for cumulative, mixture-based assessment frameworks.