DOI: 10.3390/educsci16111845 ISSN: 2227-7102

Engineering Design and Minecraft Education for Primary Students’ Attitudes Toward Science: Development and Initial Evaluation of a Stakeholder-Informed Framework

Yue Wang, Mohd Ali Samsudin, Goh Kok Ming, Siti Zulaikha Zubir

Positive attitudes toward science are relevant to students’ continuing interest in STEM learning. This study developed and initially evaluated a stakeholder-informed Engineering Design Process–Minecraft Game-Based Learning (EDP-MGBL) framework, with accessibility and participation opportunities treated as instructional design intentions rather than measured inclusion outcomes. Using a sequential two-phase mixed-methods development-and-evaluation design, Phase One drew on semi-structured interviews with Year 5 students, science teachers, curriculum specialists, and educational technology specialists to identify six needs: enjoyment, confidence, perceived relevance, learner agency, opportunities for collaboration, and visualisation of abstract energy concepts. The qualitative findings informed the subsequent design of an eight-week intervention. In Phase Two, 68 Year 5 students in western China participated in a quasi-experimental evaluation. The Attitude Toward Science Scale (ATSS), comprising Scientific Fun Feelings, Scientific Self-Efficacy, Scientific Value Identity, and Scientific Behavioural Intention, was administered at pretest, immediate post-test, and delayed post-test. A significant Group × Time interaction indicated different patterns of attitudinal change between the experimental and comparison groups. The experimental group’s total ATSS mean increased from 83.59 at pretest to 90.59 at post-test and 91.79 at delayed post-test; the comparison group showed comparatively small changes. These results provide preliminary evidence of an association between participation in the EDP-MGBL intervention and more favourable science attitudes. The six stakeholder-informed pathways are untested instructional design propositions, not identified causal mechanisms. Engagement, inclusion, and differential participation were not measured.

More from our Archive