Endoscopic Type I Tympanoplasty: Comparative Outcomes of Autograft, Allograft, and Xenograft
Yi-Chen Tsai, Chih-Yu Hu, Bang-Yan Zhang, Kuan-Ting Yeh, Kai-Chieh ChanImportance
To our knowledge, this represents the first adult-only, fully endoscopic, three-arm comparative cohort of autograft, allograft, and xenograft materials in type I tympanoplasty.
Objective
To compare graft-take, audiometric outcomes, operative time, and complications among perichondrium, MegaDerm, and Biodesign in adult endoscopic type I tympanoplasty.
Design:
Retrospective comparative cohort study.
Setting:
Tertiary referral center.
Participants:
Adults who underwent endoscopic type I tympanoplasty with perichondrium, MegaDerm or Biodesign between October 2021 and March 2025. Patients with revision surgery, concomitant otologic procedures, active middle-ear disease, profound sensorineural hearing loss, preoperative air-bone gap (ABG) ≥50 dB, or follow-up <3 months were excluded.
Intervention or Exposures
Endoscopic type I tympanoplasty using perichondrium (autograft), MegaDerm (allograft), or Biodesign (xenograft).
Main Outcome Measures:
Graft-take rate, hearing gain (air-conduction and ABG), operative time, and complications.
Results
Ninety-three ears were analyzed (perichondrium n = 33; MegaDerm n = 21; Biodesign n = 39). Three-month graft-take rates were similar, and final graft-take rates remained comparable across groups (3 months: 90.9%, 90.5%, 94.9%;
Conclusion:
In adult endoscopic type I tympanoplasty, perichondrium, MegaDerm, and Biodesign demonstrated comparable short-term graft-take and audiometric outcomes, while commercially available grafts were associated with shorter operative time.
Relevance:
These findings support patient-centered graft selection balancing donor-site considerations, operative efficiency, and cost; prospective studies with standardized follow-up and patient-reported outcomes are warranted.