Efficacy and Safety of
60 W
Versus
90 W
, 4‐s Radiofrequency Applications to the Esophagus‐Adjacent Left Atrial Posterior Wall During Pulmonary Vein
Hideharu Okamatsu, Ken Okumura, Kakeru Tomaru, Junya Matsura, Kodai Negishi, Takuo Tsurugi, Yasuaki Tanaka, Masayoshi Uehara, Junjiro Koyama, Hirofumi Tomita ABSTRACT
Background
In very high‐power (51–90 W), short‐duration (4 s) radiofrequency applications (QMODE+) using the QDOT MICRO catheter, the optimal power setting at the left atrial (LA) posterior wall adjacent to the esophagus for treating atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear.
Objective
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 60 W versus 90 W QMODE+ radiofrequency applications in the periesophageal region.
Methods
Fifty AF patients were randomized into two groups based on the QMODE+ power applied to the periesophageal region: 60 W ( n = 24) and 90 W ( n = 26). We compared the incidence of residual conduction gaps in the periesophageal region and endoscopic esophageal lesions, as well as the 1‐year atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) recurrence rate between the two groups.
Results
Median contact force was significantly higher in the
Conclusion
60 W and 90 W QMODE+ RF applications for the periesophageal region achieved comparable rates of acute conduction block, endoscopy‐detected esophageal injury, and 12‐month AT recurrence‐free survival, although contact force was significantly higher in the 60 W group.
Trial Registration
Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT); jRCT1072230115 (Registered on February 8, 2024)