Efficacy and Safety of Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) in Previously Treated Metastatic RAS-Mutated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review
Natalia Gierulska, Nina Jankowska, Zuzanna Dąbrowska, Julia Piekarz, Magdalena SkórzewskaIntroduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis, and RAS gene mutations are present in more than 90% of cases. For this reason, direct RAS inhibition is a promising, but thus far difficult to achieve, therapeutic strategy. Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) is a first-in-class, oral, non-covalent, multiselective inhibitor of the active form of RAS. It forms an intracellular trimeric complex with cyclophilin A, blocking both mutant and wild-type variants of the KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS genes. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daraxonrasib in previously treated patients with RAS-mutated PDAC. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published between January 2020 and July 2026. Two studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed: the Phase 1–2 RMC-6236-001 (n = 168) and the Phase 3 RASolute 302 trial (n = 500), involving a total of 668 patients. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for the randomized trial and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Results: In the RASolute 302 trial, daraxonrasib out performed investigator-selected chemotherapy in a population of patients with the RAS G12 mutation, improving median overall survival (13.2 vs. 6.6 months; HR 0.40), progression-free survival (7.3 vs. 3.5 months; HR 0.45), and objective response rate (33.2% vs. 11.8%; all p < 0.001), and also delayed the onset of pain and deterioration in quality of life. These results were consistent with the earlier RMC-6236-001 study (objective response rate [ORR] 35%, median overall survival [OS] 13.1 months in patients with RAS G12 mutation treated in the second-line setting). Daraxonrasib exhibited a predictable toxicity profile, consisting mainly of Grade 1–2 dermatologic and gastrointestinal symptoms, with lower rates of hematologic toxicity and treatment discontinuation than with chemotherapy. Conclusions: Daraxonrasib demonstrates clinically relevant and statistically significant efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in previously treated patients with metastatic RAS G12-mutated PDAC, the population for which the strongest randomized evidence is currently available. These findings support its potential as a promising new treatment option in this setting. Further studies are needed regarding rare RAS gene variants and forms of the disease with wild-type RAS.