DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae12081026 ISSN: 2311-7524

Effectiveness of Spectral Analysis for Evaluating Internal Quality of Korla Fragrant Pears Under Different Detection Distances

Yifei Li, Xueting Ma, Jianping Bao, Yuesen Tong, Lei Kang, Huaiyu Liu, Zhe Han, Jun Guo, Xuhang Liu, Kaijie Qi

This study investigated how detection distance affects spectral models for soluble solids content (SSC) and firmness evaluation in Korla fragrant pears and provides a reference for calibrating standardized indoor non-destructive detection equipment. Two hundred visually intact fruit samples at the early-ripening stage were collected from the Korla production area in Xinjiang. An FS-640 multispectral camera system equipped with a VS-SWR fixed-focus industrial lens (16 mm focal length, F1.8 maximum aperture, 1/2-inch sensor format) was used to acquire fruit reflectance spectra at seven vertical lens-to-fruit-surface distances of 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, and 150 cm. A 625-pixel region of interest (ROI) was selected using ENVI at an undamaged equatorial or near-equatorial position of each fruit, and the regional mean spectrum was used as the spectral feature of one fruit sample. The sample-set partitioning based on joint X–Y distances (SPXY) algorithm was used to divide the calibration and prediction sets at a 3:1 ratio after outlier removal via a residual-threshold method. Four preprocessing methods, namely LOESS smoothing, standardization, vector normalization, and Savitzky–Golay (SG) smoothing, were compared. Competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) was performed with 50 Monte-Carlo sampling runs, a maximum of 30 principal components, and 10-fold cross-validation, yielding 99 characteristic wavelengths. Partial least squares regression (PLSR), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) models were then established using identical input variables and sample partitions. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination for calibration (Rc2), coefficient of determination for prediction (RP2), root-mean-square error of calibration (RMSEC), root-mean-square error of prediction (RMSEP), relative prediction deviation (RPD), and ratio of performance to interquartile distance (RPIQ). Under the static laboratory acquisition conditions in this work, the SSC model achieved the best prediction performance at 110 cm with SG smoothing (RP2) = 0.8949, RPD = 3.0633, RPIQ = 5.8661), whereas the firmness model obtained optimal prediction performance at 140 cm with standardization (RP2) = 0.7460, RPD = 1.9425, RPIQ = 3.2867). Changes in detection distance altered illumination uniformity, effective reflected signal, photon-scattering paths, and background-noise proportion. These effects may partially explain why the chemical-absorption-dominated SSC index and the tissue-scattering-dominated firmness index responded differently to detection distance. The results provide a reference for setting spectral detection parameters for Korla fragrant pears; however, samples were obtained from only a single producing region, harvest season, and maturity stage, and no independent external validation dataset was used. Therefore, the generalization ability of the developed models needs to be further verified using cross-season and cross-orchard sample sets.

More from our Archive