Educational Needs in Cardio-Oncology: An International Survey by the COOL Group of the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology
Massimiliano Camilli, Maria Clara Llamedo, Novi Yanti Sari Tham, Trecy Gonçalves, Hasnaa Belghiti, Albulena Mecinaj, Jarosław Kępski, Madeleine Johansson, Wouter C Meijers, Pietro Ameri, Dimitrios Farmakis, Alexander R Lyon, Peter Van Der Meer, Teresa Lopez Fernandez, Mariana MirabelAbstract
Aims
Cardio-oncology has emerged as a rapidly growing discipline of cardiology. Despite its clinical relevance, structured education remains limited across medical curricula. The Cardio-Oncologists Of tomorrow Leaders (COOL) group of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Council of Cardio-Oncology conducted an international survey to assess the current state of cardio-oncology training opportunities and perceived needs among healthcare professionals.
Methods and results
An anonymized, web-based survey was distributed to cardiologists, cardiology residents and other healthcare professionals treating patients with cancer. A total of 398 respondents completed this survey (mean age 44±12 years; 60% female; 73% board-certified cardiologists). Only 10% reported exposure to cardio-oncology during medical school, and 17% during residency. The majority (>70%) indicated no structured cardio-oncology training opportunities at their institution, with national cardio-oncology programmes available to only 19% of them. Respondents identified the ESC and national cardiac societies (72%) as main stakeholders responsible for developing educational initiatives. Most participants preferred fellowships at centers of excellence (56%), webinars (53%) and university certifications (51%) as learning formats. A strong consensus (over 85%) emerged that all general cardiologists should be familiar with key cardio-oncology principles, including diagnosis and risk-stratification of cardiotoxicity. Responses differed across respondents’ training status, work setting (academic vs. non-academic) and country.
Conclusions
In parallel with the general growth of the field, there is increasing need of structured and harmonised training in cardio-oncology, including during medical education. Interpretation of results is however, limited by possible selection bias and the absence of a defined denominator, which precluded calculation of response rate.