Economic Evidence on Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), encompassing cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma, are aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis and increasing incidence in selected regions worldwide. Advances in imaging, biomarker profiling, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies have improved treatment options but have also increased the economic pressure on health systems. Understanding the economic evidence on BTC is therefore important for resource allocation and health technology assessment. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed economic studies of BTC published from January 2010 to March 2025. Eligible studies included cost-effectiveness, cost–utility, cost–benefit, cost-of-illness, and resource-use analyses. The review followed PRISMA reporting principles. Reporting completeness was assessed using CHEERS 2022, and methodological credibility was appraised using the Drummond framework. Results: Twenty studies were included: 13 cost-effectiveness or cost–utility analyses and seven cost-of-illness or resource-use studies. Conventional chemotherapy strategies, including gemcitabine plus cisplatin in some settings and other cytotoxic combinations in selected jurisdictions, generally produced more favorable economic results than newer systemic therapies, although findings varied by country, threshold, comparator, and price assumptions. First-line immunotherapy combinations and biomarker-directed targeted therapies frequently produced ICERs above jurisdiction-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds at current prices, often requiring substantial price reductions to approach cost-effectiveness. Real-world studies showed high resource use and costs, particularly with hospitalizations and later treatment lines. Evidence on screening and prevention was limited, with one study suggesting that ultrasound surveillance may be cost-effective in a liver fluke-endemic region of Thailand. Discussion: The available economic evidence suggests that affordability and jurisdiction-specific value assessment are central to BTC policy decisions. Current prices for several immunotherapy and targeted agents limit cost-effectiveness in published models, while evidence on prevention, early detection, and care-pathway interventions remains sparse and context-specific.