DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehag785.2966 ISSN: 0195-668X

Early left ventricular unloading with intra-aortic balloon pump versus micro-axial flow pump in cardiogenic shock supported by VA-ECMO: an international observational target trial emulation

A Ughetto, A Mansour, A Beurton, C Delmas, T Thevathasan, S Chetouane, A D'esparron, B Compagnon, C Beyls, A Bailly, M Moussa, M Monika Feurholz, A Hurtado, T Senage, B Schrage

Abstract

Background

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) is increasingly used during refractory cardiogenic shock (CS) but may impede myocardial recovery through increased left-ventricular afterload. Mechanical left ventricular unloading (LVU) with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or micro-axial flow pump (mAFP) may mitigate this effect; However, to date, no randomized trial has compared these strategies. We emulated a target trial to compare early LVU by IABP versus mAFP on myocardial recovery in refractory CS patients supported by V-A ECMO.

Methods

We analyzed adults with refractory CS from the international ELLIPSE registry (17 centers, 2010–2023) who received V-A ECMO plus mAFP or IABP within 24 hours of V-A ECMO initiation. Time zero was defined as initiation of unloading on top of V-A ECMO to avoid immortal-time bias. The primary endpoint was myocardial recovery at discharge (survival free from death, durable left ventricular assist device or heart transplantation) and at 1 year. Causal effects were estimated via inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW).

Results

Among 1,112 screened patients with V-A ECMO and concomitant LVU, 747 met eligibilities (IABP n=379; mAFP n=368). Before weighting, patients in the V-A ECMO/mAFP group had higher lactate level (7.7 ± 5.6 vs 6.8 ± 5.3 mmol/L; P = 0.023) and lower acute myocardial infarction prevalence (63.0% vs 72.0%; P = 0.009). Myocardial recovery at discharge was significantly higher with V-A ECMO/mAFP (33.4% vs 26.9% %; absolute difference +6.6 percentage points, 95% CI, 3.3–12.8, p = 0.04) and this association remained significant after IPTW (weighted OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56–0.96). At 1-year, myocardial recovery was significantly higher with V-A ECMO/mAFP, with longer restricted mean event-free survival compared with IABP (137 vs 110 days; absolute difference 26 days, 95% CI 5–52). Bleeding and ischemic complications were similar between groups, whereas renal replacement therapy was more frequent with V-A ECMO/mAFP.

Conclusion

In this international target-trial emulation, early LVU by mAFP during V-A ECMO was associated with higher myocardial recovery at discharge and sustained recovery at 1 year compared with IABP. These results support early active LVU and provide a rationale for randomized trials.Figure 1For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.Figure 2For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

More from our Archive