Early Consultation and Patient-Centered Decision-Making for Breast Reconstruction in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy: A Clinical Perspective
Maks Tušak, Aleš Porčnik, Andrej LapošaBreast reconstruction is an integral component of comprehensive breast cancer care rather than a merely aesthetic adjunct. For many women, reconstruction is associated with meaningful improvements in body image, psychosocial well-being, and quality of life after mastectomy. Nevertheless, it is not a mandatory part of treatment and represents a preference-sensitive decision. This article presents a clinical perspective, informed by selected literature, clinical guidelines, and institutional practice, on why patients with non-metastatic breast cancer in whom mastectomy is a realistic possibility should be offered reconstructive consultation before surgery. At that stage, reconstructive options remain open, patients have time to reflect, and expectations can be discussed realistically. Counseling should present all legitimate pathways, including implant-based and autologous reconstruction, immediate and delayed timing, the implications of postmastectomy radiotherapy, and no reconstruction with an appropriately planned primary closure. The final plan should be individualized according to oncologic safety, anticipated adjuvant treatment, anatomy, comorbidities, and the surgical burden acceptable to the patient, while also incorporating the patient’s expectations and priorities. Reconstructive consultation should therefore support shared decision-making rather than promote reconstruction, with the final informed choice remaining the patient’s own. Psychological and quality-of-life benefits vary among individuals. The success of early reconstructive involvement should not be measured by reconstruction rates, but by whether patients are able to make informed, realistic, and preference-concordant decisions. We propose a consultation framework addressing oncologic context, reconstructive feasibility, patient priorities, expectation management, treatment decisions, and alternative planning, explicitly including no reconstruction with appropriately planned primary closure when preferred. The framework has not yet undergone formal evaluation.