DOI: 10.3390/eng7070314 ISSN: 2673-4117

Dynamic Thermal Assessment of Building Envelope Systems: An Experimental and Graphical Method for Energy Performance Evaluation in Civil and Structural Applications

Rafael Ortiz-Castañón, Fabian N. Murrieta-Rico, Gabriel Trujillo-Hernández, Diego Ramón Bonilla-García, José Ramón Ayala-Bautista, Marcos Alberto Coronado-Ortega, José Alejandro Amezquita-García, José Antonio Núñez-López, María E. Raygoza-Limón

Buildings and construction account for nearly one-third of global energy demand, making the thermal performance of building envelopes an important factor in reducing heating and cooling loads. Conventional steady-state indicators are useful for comparison, but they do not always describe how complete assemblies respond to changing outdoor conditions. This study presents a dynamic experimental method for evaluating construction assemblies using energy compensation under controlled indoor conditions. A highly insulated test module was used to maintain a stable indoor temperature while measuring the electrical heating energy required to compensate for heat losses through interchangeable assemblies exposed to outdoor temperature variations. Three systems were tested: double gypsum board, hollow concrete block, and externally insulated hollow concrete block. To compare the assemblies under different outdoor conditions, corrected heating energy was normalized by test area and heating degree-hours (HDHs), resulting in a Dynamic Thermal Performance Index (DTPI). The DTPI decreased from 52.4 Wh/(m2·°C·h) for the double gypsum board assembly to 21.5 Wh/(m2·°C·h) for the externally insulated hollow concrete block, while the mean corrected heating energy decreased from 2.23 to 0.91 kWh/day. The gypsum board assembly showed the fastest thermal response and the highest energy demand, whereas the externally insulated block provided the most stable indoor-side behavior by reducing the effect of outdoor fluctuations on the concrete mass. The method links transient thermal behavior with measured energy consumption and offers a practical complement to conventional steady-state metrics for comparing building envelope systems.

More from our Archive