DOI: 10.1093/9780197851418.003.0990 ISSN:

Dynamic Discrete Choice and Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Inferring Preferences and Beliefs From Human Behavior

Pranjal Rawat, John Rust

Abstract

This article surveys two deeply connected literatures that approach the same fundamental problem from different disciplinary traditions: dynamic discrete choice (DDC) in structural econometrics and inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) in machine learning. Both seek to infer the preferences of decision makers from observed sequential behavior, assuming that individuals act to maximize an expected reward function within a dynamic, uncertain environment formalized as a Markov decision process (MDP). Despite independent origins, the two fields have converged on similar mathematical formulations. The “soft Q-learning” framework now prevalent in IRL is closely related to DDC models under additive extreme value preference shocks, yielding the same softmax (multinomial logit) choice probabilities and smooth Bellman equations that underpin structural estimation in economics. DDC has emphasized maximum likelihood estimation, conditional choice probability estimators, and policy iteration methods. IRL has developed scalable alternatives, including maximum entropy methods, adversarial approaches, and model-free temporal difference estimators that extend to high-dimensional state spaces using deep neural networks. Model-free IRL estimators that combine temporal difference learning with classical two-step methods from econometrics represent a promising direction for bridging the two literatures. Both fields confront shared foundational challenges: the identification problem, whereby multiple reward functions can rationalize the same observed behavior, and the curse of dimensionality in solving the underlying MDP. Each literature addresses these challenges using different assumptions and different objectives: DDC focuses on counterfactual policy evaluation and IRL focuses on training agents from expert demonstrations. Cross-fertilization offers substantial opportunities for methodological progress in both fields.

More from our Archive