DOI: 10.1063/5.0348125 ISSN: 1070-6631

Drag-reduction mechanisms in autonomous underwater vehicle formations: Physical analysis and physics-guided surrogate optimization

Chao Yuan, Rui Zhao, XiuJing Gao, ShangRong Zheng, JingJun Jiang, YuKe Li, DongYi Yan, DeKai Chen

The hydrodynamic interaction between closely spaced autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) in formation produces strongly nonlinear drag responses. In the present configuration space, two dominant pressure-related mechanisms are identified: stern pressure recovery at the leader and bow low-pressure immersion at the follower. To map these mechanisms over a wide formation parameter space, a physics-guided surrogate framework is constructed from 666 Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of dual-AUV configurations. Total resistance is decomposed into pressure and viscous contributions and modeled separately. Guided by the effective-boundedness principle of Learning and Inference assisted by feature-space engineering, the feature space incorporates bounded geometric descriptors, a regularized turbulent-wake power-law decay, a Gaussian lateral wake profile, and pressure-interaction proxies. The resulting surrogate achieves pressure-drag R2≈0.974–0.986 and enables formation optimization over the prescribed feasible design space. At V=5.14 m/s (approximately 10 kn), the system-optimal arrangement yields a 5.9% total-drag reduction relative to two isolated AUVs, with computational fluid dynamics verification errors below 1%. The individual optima are associated with geometrically incompatible mechanism-favorable regions: the leader optimum is located on the centerline (b/D=0), whereas the follower optimum occurs at b/D=1.5, where D denotes the maximum hull diameter. This lateral separation of 1.5D places the two individual minima in different regions of the static formation space, so they are not attained simultaneously by a single feasible configuration. A nondominated leader–follower Pareto front quantifies the resulting tradeoff and locates the system optimum as a compromise between the two competing drag objectives.