DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000005452 ISSN: 1064-8011

Does Hormonal Phase Affect Acute High-Intensity Interval Training Exercise? An Evaluation of Performance and Fatigue

Sam R. Moore, Kelly E. Joniak, Alex N. Ladan, Morgan E. Britton, Elena I. Cantu, Katie R. Hirsch, Anthony C. Hackney, Abbie E. Smith-Ryan

Abstract

Moore, SR, Joniak, KE, Ladan, AN, Britton, ME, Cantu, EI, Hirsch, KR, Hackney, AC, and Smith-Ryan, AE. Does hormonal phase affect acute high-intensity interval training exercise? An evaluation of performance and fatigue. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—Fatigue is a critical factor in high-intensity interval training (HIIT) performance, which may vary across female hormonal phases and with changes in work–rest ratio. This study evaluated exercise performance (average power [AP], peak power [PP]) and fatigue (power drop [PD; peak power–minimum power/time]) between 2 work-matched HIIT protocols during the low- (LHP) and high-hormone phases (HHP). In total, 35 women (age: 24.3 ± 6.1 years) completed 4 HIIT trials in randomized orders of hormonal phase and HIIT protocol: HIIT 1:1 : 10 rounds of 1 minute on/1 minute off; HIIT 2:1 : 20 rounds of 20 s on/10 s off. High-intensity interval training 2:1 resulted in significantly higher AP (HIIT 1:1 –HIIT 2:1 Δ−36.6 ± 2.3 W; p < 0.001) and PP (Δ−34.1 ± 4.0 W; p < 0.001) than HIIT 1:1 , with no significant difference between phase differences. When analyzed by protocol, HIIT 2:1 demonstrated greater PD in the LHP than in the HHP (Δ11.4 ± 4.7 W; p = 0.020), with no significant difference between phases for HIIT 1:1 . When collapsed across protocols, PD was significantly greater in the LHP than in the HHP (LHP–HHP Δ11.2 ± 4.9 W·s −1 ; p = 0.031). High-intensity interval training power performance (AP, PP) was influenced by the work–rest ratio, but not hormonal phase, with significantly higher power output in HIIT 2:1 . Greater PD during the LHP suggests physical fatigue may vary across hormonal phases, but the lack of HIIT 1:1 PD differences between phases may indicate augmented recovery with the equal work–rest ratio, particularly during the LHP. Although power performance was minimally different between phases, altering work–rest ratio may be a consideration for maintaining power outcomes and managing fatigue across female hormonal cycles, particularly in the LHP.

More from our Archive