DOI: 10.17275/per.26.86.13.6 ISSN: 2148-6123
Digital Literacy as a Predictor of AI Literacy: A Gender Paradox and a Knowledge–Belief Gap
Mehmet Cabir Akkoyunlu, Oğuz Onat, Yasemin Bertiz This study investigates the relationship between university students’ digital literacy and artificial intelligence (AI) literacy. Participants were 770 undergraduate students (227 male, 543 female; Mage = 21.27, SD = 2.75) recruited through online convenience and snowball sampling, with recruitment centered at Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University (Karaman, Türkiye), representing more than 120 academic programs. Data were collected with the Turkish forms of Ng’s (2012) Digital Literacy Scale (α = .931) and Wang et al.’s (2022) AI Literacy Scale (α = .803). Three findings stand out. First, digital literacy and AI literacy were strongly and positively related (r = .596, p < .001). A three-step hierarchical regression analysis identified digital literacy as the only significant predictor of AI literacy (β = .599, p < .001), explaining 35.5% of the variance (R² = .355, F(1, 768) = 422.57, p < .001); adding gender and age (ΔR² = .002) and internet use frequency (ΔR² = .000) did not significantly improve the model. Second, a small gender difference favoring men emerged in digital literacy (Cohen’s d = 0.201) but not in AI literacy (d = 0.031), a pattern we describe as a gender paradox. Third, although 85.1% of participants believed in AI’s future impact, only 22.7% rated their own AI knowledge as sufficient—a knowledge–belief gap. Self-rated AI knowledge, but not belief, differed significantly by gender (χ² = 11.05, p = .004; Cramér’s V = .120). Implications for digital and AI literacy education in higher education are discussed.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1145/3845995 2026
A Survey of LLM-based Software Repair: Taxonomies, Design Paradigms, and Applications Boyang Yang, Zijian Cai, Fengling Liu, Bach Le, Lingming Zhang, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Yang Liu, Haoye Tian
-
DOI: 10.1108/jrim-02-2024-0074 2026
Cutting-edge research in social media and interactive marketing: a
review and research agenda James W Peltier, Andrew J Dahl, Lauren Drury, Tracy Khan
-
DOI: 10.1108/jkm-04-2021-0336 2026
Knowledge hiding – a systematic review and research
agenda Amitabh Anand, Florian Offergelt, Payal Anand
-
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20230448 2026
The Unequal Economic Consequences of Carbon Pricing Diego R. Känzig
-
DOI: 10.1017/awf.2026.10115 2026
Part 1: Assessment of upright restraint of broilers for head-only electrical stunning Troy J. Gibson, Georgina Limon, Shannon Campbell, Natalie Chancellor, Katharine A Fletcher, Paul Berry, Jeff Lines
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86 2026
MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86-r2.0 2026
Codebase release 2.0 for MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85 2026
svPITE: A Python package for the state-vector-based probabilistic imaginary-time evolution algorithm Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85-r1.1 2026
Codebase release 1.1 for svPITE Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.1177/02611929261494117 2026
The World Medical Association’s
Declaration of Helsinki
and
Statement on Animal Use in Biomedical Research
: Why reliable and valid preclinical evidence and Natalie Anderson, Jane Kotzmann, Rachel Smith, Kathrin Herrmann