DOI: 10.1111/acer.70383 ISSN: 2993-7175

Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Reduces Heavy Drinking Among a Non‐Treatment Sample of People With Alcohol Use Disorder: A Feasibility Trial With CBT4CBT

Anna Beth Parlier‐Ahmad, Nicole Boss, Amber R. Green, Michelle Eglovitch, Ren Huang, Caitlin E. Martin, Lori Keyser‐Marcus, Dace S. Svikis

ABSTRACT

Background

Most people with alcohol use disorder (AUD) do not receive treatment. Few digital evidence‐based treatments have been tested among community‐based samples of people with AUD. The present trial of Computer‐Based Training for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT4CBT) (1) assessed CBT4CBT usability and acceptability and (2) explored alcohol‐related outcomes by study condition in a non‐treatment sample of people with AUD.

Methods

For the current two‐arm clinical trial, a non‐treatment sample of people with lifetime AUD and current heavy drinking was recruited using ResearchMatch.org and randomized (3:1) to the CBT4CBT program or an assessment‐only control, stratified by sex ( N  = 160 total; CBT: n  = 109; Co: n  = 51). Study assessments included post‐intervention acceptability ratings and self‐reported alcohol‐related measures administered at baseline, post‐intervention, and 1‐month follow‐up.

Results

Participants were 68.1% female and 31.9% male, in their early forties ( M  = 42.6, SD = 15.7, range 19–76 years). Most participants identified as white (65.0%) or Black (27.5%) and non‐Latinx (89.4%). Acceptability ratings and usability measures for CBT4CBT were favorable and comparable to studies among clinical treatment samples. Participants in the CBT4CBT group demonstrated faster reductions in the percentage of drinking days and were significantly less likely to report any heavy drinking days than those in the control condition at 1‐month follow‐up. The CBT4CBT group reported higher recovery scores than the control group.

Conclusions

The present study provides benchmark data on the use of CBT4CBT in a sample of people with AUD not receiving treatment. Findings have important clinical and research implications for expanding the reach of evidence‐based addiction treatment beyond traditional treatment settings.

More from our Archive