Differences in Pathogenic Bacteria Identification in Hemodialysis Patients with Urinary Tract Infections: A Traditional Culture Methods Versus Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing
Noor A. Al-Ogaili, Wathiq A. Al-DraghiAbstract
Background:
The development of a promising metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology that objectively enables the detection of pathogens is gaining popularity for application in clinical diagnosis.
Objective:
We aimed to reanalyze cases where traditional culture identified
Materials and Methods:
A total of 150 male and female samples (10 mL midstream urine) under more than 1 year of hemodialysis therapy were collected from hospitals and private labs in Baghdad, Iraq. They were tested for urinary tract infection (UTI) by microscopic and culture methods. Four samples, which were detected with
Results:
From 150 samples, 71 (47.3%) patients were positive for UTI by microscopic examination, and 59 (83.1%) were positive for UTI by urine culture, whereas 12 (16.9%) samples produced negative urine culture. Of the positive urine culture and Vitek-2 system, the results found that the following bacterial species were isolated: 12 (19.7%) Gram-positive bacteria,
Conclusion:
This study reviews the sensitivity and limitations of culture methods compared with next-generation sequencing, highlighting the importance of integrating advanced molecular techniques in diagnostic workflows and showing that the vast majority of UTI bacteria were Gram-negative.