Diagnostic Utility of SS18-SSX Fusion-Specific and SSX C-Terminus Antibodies in Synovial Sarcoma: Validation in a Large Indian Tertiary Care Cohort
Sahana Khatoon, Balamurugan Thirunavukkarasu, Adarsh W. Barwad, Venkatesan S. Kumar, Sameer Bakhshi, Ekta Dhamija, Asit R. MridhaDiagnosis of synovial sarcoma (SS) requires molecular confirmation of the SS18-SSX fusion by FISH or RT-PCR, but these methods are costly and limited in resource-constrained settings. Recently developed fusion-specific antibodies offer potential alternatives, but validation in resource-limited settings remains limited. We evaluated SS18-SSX fusion-specific (E9X9V) and SSX C-terminus (E5A2C) antibodies in 50 FISH-confirmed SS cases and 50 histologic mimics from a tertiary cancer center (July 2023 to June 2025). Nuclear staining was scored (0 to 8 scale, grade 0 to 3; grade ≥2 considered positive). Five SS cases had technically noninterpretable SS18-SSX staining and were excluded from the analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated with 95% CIs. SS18-SSX showed 95.6% sensitivity (43/45 interpretable SS cases; 95% CI: 84.9-99.5%) and 100% specificity (50/50 controls). SSX C-terminus demonstrated 100% sensitivity (50/50 SS) but 94.0% specificity (47/50 controls), with false positivity in 3 mimics (medullary thymoma, spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma, and MPNST). SSX C-terminus showed perfect sensitivity, such that a negative stain effectively excludes synovial sarcoma, whereas SS18-SSX showed perfect specificity, such that a positive stain confirms the diagnosis. Sequential interpretation of both antibodies is a reliable, lower-cost alternative to molecular testing in resource-limited settings, with FISH reserved for indeterminate results.