DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020167 ISSN: 2072-6694

Diagnostic Performance of PIVKA-II in Italian Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Valeria Guarneri, Elisabetta Loggi, Giuseppe Ramacieri, Carla Serra, Ranka Vukotic, Giovanni Vitale, Alessandra Scuteri, Carmela Cursaro, Marzia Margotti, Silvia Galli, Maria Caracausi, Lucia Brodosi, Filippo Gabrielli, Pietro Andreone

Background and Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Six-month imaging along with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) serum levels detection are the current gold standard to exclude HCC. Protein induced by vitamin K absence (PIVKA-II) has been proposed as a potential screening biomarker for HCC. This study was designed to evaluate the role of PIVKA-II as diagnostic HCC marker, and the correlation between PIVKA-II levels and HCC stage. Methods: PIVKA-II levels were assessed on serum samples of Italian patients. The study population included 80 patients with HCC, 111 with liver cirrhosis (LC), and 111 with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Results: PIVKA-II serum levels progressively increase from patients with CHC to patients with HCC. In the HCC group, PIVKA-II values are higher in the more advanced stages of the disease, assessed by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system (BCLC-B vs. BCLC-A vs. BCLC-0). Youden’s index analysis identified a value >37 mAU/mL as the optimal threshold for the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (80% and 76%, respectively) and, at the best cut-off of 5.2 ng/mL, AFP yielded 53% specificity and 78% sensitivity. The combination of PIVKA-II and AFP reached positive and negative predictive values of 73.9% and 94.2%, respectively. Conclusions: PIVKA-II levels are increased in the HCC patients, compared to control groups. The increase is more evident in patients with advanced HCC. The diagnostic performance of PIVKA-II seems more sensitive than AFP while the combination of PIVKA-II and AFP resulted in the best diagnostic accuracy, reaching 73.9% positive predictive value and 94.2% negative predictive value, thus improving the diagnostic capability of the single marker.

More from our Archive