DFU-MambaKAN: A Lightweight Hybrid Mamba-KAN Architecture for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Screening and Severity Grading
Md Nafis Azad Nobel, Sazid Rahman Kazi, Tajul Islam Rafi, Mainuddin Adel Rafi, Umer Aqeel, Md Ranu Hossen, Md Al Ridwan, Roise UddinDiabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major cause of lower-extremity amputation, and image-based decision support may assist screening and preliminary triage where specialist access is limited. We propose DFU-MambaKAN, a hybrid architecture combining a pure-PyTorch selective state-space (Mamba) block with a Gaussian radial-basis-function Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (RBF-KAN) feed-forward layer. The study evaluates two distinct tasks: (1) binary normal-versus-ulcer screening and (2) a dataset-specific four-class Wagner-Meggitt severity-grading task. DFU-MambaKAN contains 1.062 million parameters and was compared with ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0, MobileNetV3-Small, and ViT-Tiny under the manuscript’s common downstream training protocol. The reported values are point estimates from one deterministic 70/15/15 split generated with seed 42; no confidence intervals, repeated-seed averages, or inferential significance tests were obtained. On binary screening, DFU-MambaKAN achieved 97.17% accuracy, macro-F1 0.970, and AUC 0.994. On four-class grading, it achieved 67.75% accuracy, macro-F1 0.677, and AUC 0.895, whereas the baselines achieved 98.14–99.00% accuracy. This large gap means that the present evidence does not establish competitiveness for multiclass severity grading. Possible contributors include training duration and convergence, dataset size and class definitions, label or image-quality uncertainty, hyperparameter selection, global token mixing, and architecture–task mismatch; extended learning-curve analysis and multi-seed evaluation are needed to test these explanations. An automated technical audit identified 342 exact duplicates among 1055 class-folder images in Dataset A (32.4%); no deduplicated-versus-nondeduplicated performance comparison was performed, so this finding is reported as a methodological caution rather than proof of accuracy inflation. The model’s 1.062M parameter count supports parameter-efficient storage, but its measured single-image GPU latency was 90.54–93.14 ms, substantially higher than the baselines. Accordingly, the current evidence supports further investigation for batched or queued screening more strongly than immediate real-time mobile deployment. External clinical validation, multi-seed analysis, statistical testing, convergence studies, and component ablations remain necessary.