Developing a Professional Learning Framework for Alternatively Certified Teachers: A Delphi Study of Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositions
Michael J. Brody, Marcie D. ReuerTeacher shortages and expanding alternative certification pathways have intensified the need for coherent support for teachers entering classrooms through nontraditional routes. This three-round Delphi study identified professional-learning priorities for newly alternatively certified teachers. Thirty-six K-12 teachers, administrators, and teacher educators in rural and semi-rural Montana completed all three rounds. Round 1 generated 120 open-ended responses, which were refined into 108 Round 2 statements; 97 statements advanced to Round 3. The study defined consensus as a mean of at least 4.00 and a standard deviation of no more than 0.75. The supplied final item lists contained 89 rated statements: 29 knowledge, 26 skills, and 34 dispositions. Item-level verification against the supplied Round 3 summary statistics showed that 53 of the 89 statements met both criteria: 7 knowledge, 19 skills, and 27 dispositions. All 89 items are reported for transparency, together with means, standard deviations, criterion status, and provisional domain assignments. The framework organizes the rated priorities into four theory-informed professional-learning domains. Findings should be interpreted as structured expert judgment and a framework-development resource, not evidence of teacher effectiveness or a validated measurement model.