Design-Oriented Comparison of Si–Me (Me = Mo, Ti, Zr, Ta, W) Infiltration Coatings on C/C Sonotrodes for Ultrasonic Atomization of CuSn8: Microstructure, Phase Constitution, Wettability, Nanoindentation, and Process Performance
Tomasz Choma, Mirosław Jakub Kruszewski, Aleksandra Chądzyńska, Bartosz Kalicki, Bartosz Morończyk, Jakub Ciftci, Łukasz Żrodowski, Joanna Zdunek, Marcin LeonowiczThis study compares five Si–Me infiltration coatings, Si:Mo (1:4), Si:Ti (1:1), Si:Zr (1:5), Si:Ta (1:1), and Si:W (1:5), deposited on C/C sonotrodes for ultrasonic atomization of CuSn8. The coatings were evaluated in terms of phase constitution, microstructure, wettability, nanoindentation response, and powder-production performance. XRD showed that the coatings formed distinct multiphase reaction layers, with Si:Ta (1:1) being the most silicide-dominated system, while the other coatings contained carbide or silicide–carbide phases. Metallization strongly improved the surface wettability of C/C, especially for Si:Zr (1:5) and Si:W (1:5). Nanoindentation indicated the most favorable H/E* and H3/E*2 descriptors for Si:W (1:5) and Si:Mo (1:4). All coatings enabled high powder yields in single-run atomization tests, while apparent differences in particle-size distribution were observed among the coating conditions. Overall, the results show that coating selection for ultrasonic atomization should combine phase constitution, surface-state descriptors, near-surface mechanical response, layer retention, and process performance. Within the investigated conditions and the limitation of single-run atomization experiments, Si:W (1:5) emerged as the most promising and best-balanced coating candidate, while Si:Ta (1:1) and Si:Mo (1:4) remained relevant alternatives.