- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Building and Construction
There is a global need to create an environmentally low-impact and socially fair international food and agriculture system. Specifically, in the case of chocolate, since it is difficult to produce locally in consumer countries, the socio-economic impact and benefits of its production have long been unfairly distributed. This research analyses the differences between the global environmental impacts of Fairtrade-certified and organically produced cocoa (from Peru), sold in the form of a chocolate bar purchased in the Basque Country (Europe), and the respective average conventional product made with non-organic cocoa beans (from Ivory Coast). Life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was used to calculate five impact categories, while ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint Hierarchist was used to analyse the global warming potential (GWP), terrestrial ecotoxicity (TE), and environmental footprint (ENVF, for land use); AWARE was used to measure the water footprint (WF); and cumulative energy demand (CED) assessed energy footprint (EF). The selected functional unit (FU) is 1 kg of final chocolate bar (72% cocoa), extrapolating the characteristics of a 150 g bar. The system boundaries take into account a cradle-to-gate LCA covering the following phases: the production of ingredients, the processing of cocoa paste, transportation and packaging, the manufacture of the chocolate, and its final retail distribution. The results show that certified Organic Agriculture and Fairtrade (OA&FT) chocolate had an average global warming potential (GWP) of 3.37 kg CO2-eq per kilogram, 57.3% lower than Conventional Agriculture (CA)-based chocolate, with the greatest reduction associated with the production of ingredients, at −71.8%. The OA&FT chocolate studied had an 87.4% lower impact in the category of terrestrial ecotoxicity (TE) than that of the CA-based chocolate, yielding 13.7 and 108.6 kg 1,4-DCB per kilogram, respectively. The greatest reduction in the TE impact category also occurred for the OA&FT chocolate in the ingredient production phase, at 93%. Reductions in energy footprint (EF) and water footprint (WF) were also observed in the OA&FT product (21% and 5%). In contrast, although OA&FT processing drastically reduced the associated environmental loads, an increase in packaging and transport phase impacts was observed in the GWP and TE categories (95% and 107%, respectively). Similarly, an increase of 18.7% was observed in the land use footprint for the OA&FT chocolate. The greater need for cropland is compensated by the reduction of 449.02 kg 1,4-DCB·person−1 year−1 in the TE category. This research shows that replacing the current consumption of CA cocoa with OA&FT cocoa has the potential to reduce the GWP by 21.95 kg CO2-eq·person−1·year−1, reducing the current Basque average emission range of 8.4 tCO2-eq·year−1 by 0.26%. As a future subject to study, it was also found that the impact of long-distance maritime transportation and packaging could still have the potential to be reduced, it currently being the cause of up to 11% of the GWP from OA&FT cocoa.
Need a simple solution for managing your BibTeX entries? Explore CiteDrive!
- Web-based, modern reference management
- Collaborate and share with fellow researchers
- Integration with Overleaf
- Comprehensive BibTeX/BibLaTeX support
- Save articles and websites directly from your browser
- Search for new articles from a database of tens of millions of references
Try out CiteDrive More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12648 2024
Evaluation of oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.) populations for autumn sowing production in Southwest China
Yongjie Zhang, Shuchang Li, Xiaolong Dong, Qiuyu Mou, Jiajie Li, Xinyi Zhang, Min Lin, Kaiquan Yu, Pingping Zhou, Xiaobo Liu, Xiaoling Luo, Honghai Yan, Yuanying Peng
-
DOI: 10.3390/su16020660 2024
Route Planning under Mobility Restrictions in the Palestinian Territories
Hala Aburas, Isam Shahrour, Carlo Giglio
-
DOI: 10.3390/su16020659 2024
Implementation of Integrated Life Cycle Design Principles in Ground Improvement and Piling Methods—A Review
Aleksandra Mach, Daniel Wałach
-
DOI: 10.3390/su16020661 2024
Temporal–Spatial Changes in Vegetation Coverage under Climate Change and Human Activities: A Case Study of Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration, China
Yijiao Li, Yuhong Song, Xiaozhu Cao, Linyun Huang, Jianqun Zhu
-
DOI: 10.3390/su16020662 2024
Unlocking the Sustainable Workplace Equality Policy (SWEP): Evidence from an Emerging Country
Mohammed Hossain, Yasean A. Tahat, Naser AbuGhazaleh
-
DOI: 10.3390/su16020663 2024
Italian Entertainment Professionals’ Sustainable Employability: What Factors to Consider? A Network Analysis
Eleonora Picco, Andrea Gragnano, Massimo Miglioretti
-
DOI: 10.3390/su16020654 2024
Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Romanian Entrepreneurs’ Funding Sources in the Present-Day Context of Sustainability
Carmen Elena Anton, Alexandra Zamfirache, Ruxandra-Gabriela Albu, Titus Suciu, Sergiu Mihai Sofian, Oana-Andreea Ghiță-Pîrnuță
-
DOI: 10.3390/su16020657 2024
Investigation of Outdoor Thermal Comfort for Campus Pedestrian Walkways in Thailand
Naphat Suwanmanee, Nopadon Kronprasert, Chomphunut Sutheerakul, Kriangkrai Arunotayanun, Damrongsak Rinchumphu
-
DOI: 10.3390/su16020658 2024
Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Traffic Flow in Rural and Urban Areas Using a Traffic Flow Simulator
Makoto Fujiu, Yuma Morisaki, Jyunich Takayama
-
DOI: 10.3390/su16020664 2024
Effects of Clipping Intensity on the Physiology of Dicranopteris pedata and Its Interroot Soil in the Rare-Earth-Mining Area in Southern China
Yu Lin, Zhiqiang Chen, Weiye Li, Zhibiao Chen