Cross‐Sectional and Longitudinal Comparison of Commonly Used Screening Tools for Bipolar Disorders
Anna Tröger, Yiqi Zeng, Thomas Richardson, Emma Palmer‐Cooper, Allan H. Young, Rebecca StrawbridgeABSTRACT
Background
Misdiagnosis is common in bipolar disorder (BD). Currently used screening tools are brief and cost‐effective, but there is a lack of understanding of their reliability over time, as well as whether responses are influenced by demographic or clinical factors.
Aims
To examine the cross‐sectional and longitudinal reliability and validity of two commonly used screening tools, as well as their associations with current mood states and other participant characteristics.
Methods
A total of 331 adult patients with a diagnosis of BD completed the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) and the Hypomania Symptom Checklist‐32 (HCL‐32) as well as measures of mood online at baseline and three months later.
Results
The MDQ was found to have low reliability with poor internal consistency (α = 0.531; α = 0.647 at respective timepoints) and test–retest reliability ( r s = 0.582). The HCL‐32 was more reliable with good internal consistency (α = 0.815 at both timepoints) and test–retest reliability ( r s = 0.725). MDQ scores were significantly positively associated with comorbidities and current symptoms of activation/mania, and negatively correlated with age and years since last hospitalisation. The HCL‐32 was also significantly positively correlated with activation/mania, and negatively correlated with age, years since diagnosis and years since last hospitalisation. BD‐I patients scored higher than other BD subtypes. Mood state was the only variable with a significant change over time.
Conclusions
The HCL‐32 appeared more reliable than the MDQ, although all participants needed to exceed an MDQ threshold at baseline to participate in the study, which may have biased our results.