DOI: 10.3390/jrfm19080594 ISSN: 1911-8074

Credit Deepening and Bank Asset Quality: Dynamic Early-Warning Evidence from 58 Countries

Marco Antonio Ledesma Munive, Alejandro Anibal Aguirre-Rojas, Graciela Soledad Verastegui Velasquez, William Huanca, Pilar Zevallos, Nivaneth Valencia

This study examines whether the accumulated stock of private credit provides early-warning information for subsequent deterioration in banking-sector asset quality. It combines annual Passport banking indicators with World Development Indicators for 58 countries over 2010–2024; the preferred sample contains 746 country–year observations. A second-order dynamic fixed-effects model links log(1 + NPL), where NPL denotes the non-performing loan ratio, to lagged private credit to gross domestic product (GDP), real credit growth, lending rates, bank capital, GDP growth, inflation, and unemployment. Its preferred credit-depth coefficient is 0.00377, implying that a 10-percentage-point increase is associated with approximately 0.15 percentage points more NPLs one year later at the sample median. To operationalize early-warning calibration without claiming a universal cutoff, the paper reports the sample credit-depth quartiles and estimates a country fixed-effects linear probability model using the European Banking Authority’s 5% gross-NPL supervisory trigger. In that alternative outcome, a 10-percentage-point increase in credit depth is associated with a 2.78-percentage-point higher conditional probability of NPLs reaching 5% or more (p = 0.002). On a strictly common 609-observation sample, the credit-depth coefficients at one-, two-, and three-year horizons are 0.00501, 0.00960, and 0.01266. Lending rates and unemployment are positive, whereas annual credit growth and capital ratios are not robust predictors. Pooled interactions do not reject equal slopes across broad country partitions. System generalized method of moments (GMM) passes conventional tests but violates a persistence-bound credibility check. The evidence supports an early-warning interpretation, not a causal claim.

More from our Archive