Cost burden of productivity loss due to sickness presenteeism among nurses in South Korea: A cross‐sectional study
Minkyung Kang, Ari Min, Chang Park, Inah KimAbstract
Aim
This study aimed to estimate the annual cost burden of productivity loss due to sickness presenteeism among hospital nurses in South Korea.
Background
Despite nurses being potentially more vulnerable to presenteeism, few studies have analyzed nurses’ productivity losses due to sickness presenteeism.
Methods
This cross‐sectional study employed an online survey in January 2023 with 607 nurses working in general/tertiary hospitals in South Korea. The annual cost burden of productivity loss due to sickness presenteeism was calculated based on nurse health conditions, productivity loss, the number of days worked while sick, and income. This study was reported according to the STROBE checklist.
Results
Overall, 93.2% of participants (n = 566) reported at least one health condition, and musculoskeletal diseases were the most prevalent, followed by weariness or fatigue, and sleep‐related problems. Approximately 63.9% of participants reported experiencing sickness presenteeism in the preceding four weeks. Those in the severe multimorbidity group exhibited the highest prevalence of sickness presenteeism and productivity loss. The average annual cost of productivity loss due to sickness presenteeism was USD 2,388.26 per nurse and USD 382.11 million at the national level.
Discussion
The cost of sickness presenteeism is high among hospital nurses in South Korea. Nurses with severe multimorbidity engaged in more sickness presenteeism and had higher productivity losses than nurses who were relatively healthy or exhibited moderate multimorbidity.
Conclusion
These findings support the need for stakeholders to develop strategies/policies to better address nurses’ health conditions, secure better staffing, and reduce sickness presenteeism.
Implications for nursing policy
Addressing this issue will not only improve nurse well‐being and patient care but also lead to substantial cost savings for healthcare facilities. Additionally, the study findings can inform future cost‐effectiveness studies.