Conversion Surgery for Advanced Gastric Cancer According to First-Line Treatment Strategy: A Single-Center Experience with a Focused Review of the Literature
Jun Kinoshita, Kenta Doden, Kengo Hayashi, Ryota Matsui, Hiroto Saito, Megumi Watanabe, Toshikatsu Tsuji, Daisuke Yamamoto, Noriyuki InakiBackground/Objectives: First-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) has evolved from cytotoxic chemotherapy to HER2-targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens, yet conversion surgery (CS) outcomes across these strategies remain poorly characterized. We describe CS outcomes and prognostic factors by first-line strategy at a single center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 187 patients with AGC who began first-line therapy from 2011, grouped as cytotoxic (CTX, n = 127), HER2-targeted (trastuzumab, n = 21), or ICI (n = 39). CS was defined as resection after response, including an extended oligometastatic definition (n = 74). Overall survival (OS) was measured from chemotherapy initiation, and prognostic factors were assessed by Cox regression. Results: Median OS was 14.8, 18.9, and 20.9 months for CTX, trastuzumab, and ICI, respectively (p = 0.048). CS rates were comparable (41%, 33%, and 38%; p = 0.794). Pathological response was more pronounced after trastuzumab/ICI (grade 3 and ypStage 0/1; both p < 0.001). Among CS cases, R0 resection (hazard ratio [HR] 0.31) and trastuzumab/ICI therapy (HR 0.37) were independent favorable factors, whereas high inflammatory–nutritional indices (NLR, CAR) were independent poor prognostic factors. OS was comparable between oligometastatic and conventional CS (p = 0.324). Conclusions: In this hypothesis-generating study, response depth tracked tumor biology, whereas survival was determined by R0 resection, targeted/ICI therapy, and host inflammatory–nutritional status—two largely dissociable axes informing biology- and host-based selection of CS candidates for prospective testing.