DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.030480 ISSN:

Continuous Versus Bolus Thermodilution‐Derived Coronary Flow Reserve and Microvascular Resistance Reserve and Their Association With Angina and Quality of Life in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronaries: A Head‐to‐Head Comparison

Tijn P. J. Jansen, Annemiek de Vos, Valeria Paradies, Aukelien Dimitriu‐Leen, Caïa Crooijmans, Suzette Elias‐Smale, Laura Rodwell, Angela H. E. M. Maas, Pieter C. Smits, Nico Pijls, Niels van Royen, Peter Damman
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Show PDF Cite

Background

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) are physiological parameters to assess coronary microvascular dysfunction. CFR and MRR can be assessed using bolus or continuous thermodilution, and the correlation between these methods has not been clarified. Furthermore, their association with angina and quality of life is unknown.

Methods and Results

In total, 246 consecutive patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries from the multicenter Netherlands Registry of Invasive Coronary Vasomotor Function Testing (NL‐CFT) were investigated. The 36‐item Short Form Health Survey Quality of Life and Seattle Angina questionnaires were completed by 153 patients before the invasive measurements. CFR and MRR were measured consecutively with bolus and continuous thermodilution. Mean continuous thermodilution‐derived coronary flow reserve (CFR abs ) was significantly lower than mean bolus thermodilution‐derived coronary flow reserve (CFR bolus ) (2.6±1.0 versus 3.5±1.8; P <0.001), with a modest correlation ( ρ =0.305; P <0.001). Mean continuous thermodilution‐derived microvascular resistance reserve (MRR abs ) was also significantly lower than mean bolus thermodilution‐derived MRR (MRR bolus ) (3.1±1.1 versus 4.2±2.5; P <0.001), with a weak correlation ( ρ =0.280; P <0.001). CFR bolus and MRR bolus showed no correlation with any of the angina and quality of life domains, whereas CFR abs and MRR abs showed a significant correlation with physical limitation ( P =0.005, P =0.009, respectively) and health ( P =0.026, P =0.012). In a subanalysis in patients in whom spasm was excluded, the correlation further improved (MRR abs versus physical limitation: ρ =0.363; P =0.041, MRR abs versus physical health: ρ =0.482; P =0.004). No association with angina frequency and stability was found.

Conclusions

Absolute flow measurements using continuous thermodilution to calculate CFR abs and MRR abs weakly correlate with, and are lower than, the surrogates CFR bolus and MRR bolus . Absolute flow parameters showed a relationship with physical complaints. No relationship with angina frequency and stability was found.

More from our Archive