Complications in Patients with STEMI versus Non-STEMI: A Clinical Comparison
Dan Pasaroiu, Imre Benedek, Adriana Blendea, Teodora Popa, Constantin Tolescu, Monica Chitu, Theodora BenedekABSTRACT
Background
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), each with distinct clinical profiles and outcomes. While STEMI is typically associated with more extensive infarcts, emerging data suggest NSTEMI may carry a greater burden of comorbidities and anatomical complexity.
Objective
To compare the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and hemodynamic instability in patients with STEMI vs. NSTEMI and to analyze the distribution of culprit coronary lesions. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 172 patients who underwent coronary revascularization between April and July 2021. Clinical outcomes, arrhythmias, and hemodynamic instability were compared between groups with STEMI (n = 108) and NSTEMI (n = 64). Culprit lesions were evaluated by angiography and categorized by vessel.
Results
Hemodynamic instability was significantly more common in patients with NSTEMI (10.93%) compared to STEMI (0.18%) (p = 0.005). Ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 12.03% of patients with STEMI and 7.81% of patients with NSTEMI, with no significant difference. Left main coronary artery lesions were notably more frequent in NSTEMI (47.4% vs. 2.04%; p < 0.0001), whereas right coronary artery involvement was higher in STEMI (40.81% vs. 7.4%; p < 0.0001). Ventricular arrhythmias were significantly associated with circumflex artery lesions in patients with NSTEMI (p = 0.0001).
Conclusions
Despite often being perceived as lower risk, patients with NSTEMI exhibited a higher rate of hemodynamic instability and more complex coronary involvement, particularly left main disease. These findings highlight the need for vigilant monitoring and individualized treatment strategies in populations with NSTEMI.